I might need a fuel pump. Which to get?

Discussion in 'General Turbo Buick Tech' started by SpeeednV6, Jul 26, 2012.

  1. SpeeednV6 Member

    Message Count:
    213
    Offline
    My Walbro mght be out. Which pump to get now? I want to stay with a single pump. I am getting a RJC F/M. My goals are 10.5 in the 1/4. I have a TE-66 big shaft turbo. I might get Alchy soon and E-85 conversion sometime later. Please chime in. I know of the Supra, Stealth, Bosch 044, and Deutche? pumps.
  2. Boost231 What's An Intercooler

    Message Count:
    11,602
    Offline
  3. 87WE4BOOSTED I NEED MORE BOOST!!

    Message Count:
    710
    Offline
    ^X2! DW here. Drop in replacement, proven, w/ 3 year warranty.:D Sold!!!
  4. DMM New Member

    Message Count:
    10
    Offline
    Out of curiosity...do you have to upgrade the OE return line if you install anything larger than a 255 lph pump? I thought I read that somewhere.
  5. trbojo 'Stang Stinger

    Message Count:
    855
    Offline
    i've been using a Red Armstrong XP for about 4 years without problem...plenty for your goals with alky.....
  6. 87WE4BOOSTED I NEED MORE BOOST!!

    Message Count:
    710
    Offline
    ^ @ DMM, no. I had to readjust my FP. I wish I could have got lucky with Walbro. Shame on Walbro the first time, shame on me the second. There will be no third time.:confused:
  7. Howling Mad Member

    Message Count:
    278
    Online
    Racetronix has a nw pump out. Looks pretty bad a§§
  8. SpeeednV6 Member

    Message Count:
    213
    Offline
    Any other suggestions?
  9. PLAINWHITE T Tree peddler

    Message Count:
    458
    Offline
    I've been using the DW pump on E85 since April, but I'm nowhere near the 10.5 range....I'd be nervous with a single pump at that level. I'm using stock return line and fuel pressure at idle is fine.
  10. SpeeednV6 Member

    Message Count:
    213
    Offline
    So no mods to fuel line with DW pump?
  11. PLAINWHITE T Tree peddler

    Message Count:
    458
    Offline
    At least on mine it wasn't needed...but my "build" is very mild. Stock turbo, 3" DP, 83lb injectors, hotwire, LS1 Maf, Dutt Neck, etc. I'm sure someone more educated than I can chime in with thoughts that may be more pertinent to your particular build.

    I might add that you may want to upgrade the rubber hoses to E85 compliant pieces while you have the tank down.
  12. SpeeednV6 Member

    Message Count:
    213
    Offline
    Well, since I just redid the grounds, I did notice the fuel lines are rusting out. I may end up changing them out afterall.
  13. cuda6pak Member

    Message Count:
    444
    Offline
    I run stock lines, DW pump, and no idle or FP issues
  14. brif Member

    Message Count:
    120
    Offline
    I installed a DW pump and I couldn't get my idle pressure below 50. After installing a new return line I was able to get it down to where it needed to be.
  15. Flyin Brian Member

    Message Count:
    143
    Offline
    I had to run a bigger FPR and return line to get my Deatschwerks idle pressure down. I think every car is diffferent, dents and kinks in stock lines, voltage supply to pump, etc. I since switched to the Racetronix double pumper setup and bigger lines everywhere. Want to buy my Deatschwerks pump? I only ran it for a few months this year.
  16. Ttype6 Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    1,697
    Offline
    You won't have to change it,but you might have to modify it.
    I recommend that you,at least call Red and talk to him. (440) 235-3232
    I recommend his double pumper unless he has something else in the works.
    You're at the upper limits of a single pump.
  17. Ttype6 Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    1,697
    Offline
    There's no need to change the lines. Red makes 1,000 hp with stock,unmodified,lines.
    I recommend that you drill the four Saginaw fittings to .299" on the supply line.
    Since the double pumper,never moves more fuel than the return line can handle, (because the second pump doesn't come on until the motor is ,already using a lot of the fuel that the first pump supplies) it never overpowers the return line. Because of this,there's no need to modify the return line or replace it.

    The other thing I don't like about a single,larger flowing pump is that you are sending more fuel to the motor that doesn't get used,during low fuel demand,ie. idle and cruising. This means more fuel is getting heated and returned to the tank. It needlessly heats the fuel.

    If you want to run the DW pump,you don't have to replace the return line or regulator. If you have a problem lowering your idle fuel pressure,you only need to drill the two Saginaw fittings on the return line to a larger diameter.
    John Wilde likes this.
  18. Ttype6 Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    1,697
    Offline
    If you run E85,your motor will use 30% more fuel at idle,so you wouldn't need to modify or replace the return line.
    Since you use 30% more fuel throughout the power band,this single pump will run out of steam sooner.
  19. Ttype6 Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    1,697
    Offline
    I always recommend a volt booster because it allows any pump to flow more and allows the ignition system to produce more energy.
    The best way to supply fuel to any motor is to give it,only,the fuel it needs,when it needs it.
    The way you accomplish this is with Pulse Width Modulation (computer controlled on time of the pump).
    When you feed a motor this way you don't need a fuel return line.
    If fuel never gets returned to the tank,the fuel in the tank doesn't get heated by the motor.

    The closest thing,we have,to this is the Walbro with a volt booster.
    When that isn't enough,we have the double pumper with a volt booster.
  20. Ttype6 Well-Known Member

    Message Count:
    1,697
    Offline
    I think that the best application for the DW is as a second pump in a double pumper set-up.

Share This Page

^ Top