I know it cost to run any board and I’m not flaming you Charlie or the board by any means. Just thinking how do we encourage innovation for these cars that we so love….
Fact of the matter remains, requiring a small back yard guy that has never had any experience selling a product to pay their dues in order to sell one item they came up with on any web site is hurting all of us. It actually hurts a free exchange of information and ideals. I’m not saying this is true for the vendor that is trying to sneak in and fly under the radar to dodge dues, they need to be booted. This community is small enough, the last thing we should do is discourage people from posting new parts & new ideals for sale. A lot of people making these parts aren't making a living at it and don't have deep pockets to sustain advertising the way a vendor doing it full time does. Requiring these back yard innovators to pay to play just keeps their new products off of our computer screen, out of our hands and off our cars where we never hear about them.
I don’t know what the answer is but…
Maybe an ideal to have an “Innovation of Products Section” on the board and allow the backyard guy to show something off for 1-6 months or so at an enter level cost of advertising by the month, then make a decision as to whether his ideal is profitable or not to continue on. Seems like that would help encourage innovation to continue for these out dated dinosaurs to live on by the person just tinkering around in the garage.
Again not slamming anybody or the board, just got to thinking how do we encourage new backyard innovation to come to market rather than snuff it out?
Which is all true.
And the rules if you will - are to say the least - a bit inconsistent and unevenly enforced.
For instance - is a group buy of a certain dash upgrade package that contains at least 5 pages of thread bandwidth - a vendor? - or someone just helping the cause?
And I have no doubt it helps the cause.
But in the end, in addition to the altruistic intentions, there is a profit motive.
I'm sure someone and some company is making money from the ability to basically advertise for free to a very specifically targeted market on this board
Again - the making money part - is as it should be as that is how our capitalistic society in the USA works.
And I'm all for it. It has made millionaires of everyday people. But it's not right for a individual and unrelated for profit enterprises be able to benefit financially from what is essentially free advertising.
Small as this group might be - that user demographic data - is gold in the internet world.
That's why Twitter is market capped at 20 Billion - not because they make any money - but because they they can tell advertisers the age and sex of a person likes brown, fur lined glove gloves, on Jan 12th, in Syracuse, NY.
And lets face it - since their is no member user subscription fee - the business model must be one of advertising based.
Like most of the interweb.
The rules of the road I thought were actually defined and pretty simple.
If you had a creation - you posted it in the "How To" sections - with the caveat of NO Solicitation
To sell more than one - be a vendor or bust.
But I have no dog in this fight, and am happy with whatever - since I do more of the buying and less of the selling.