I couldn't understand because you don't have a firm grasp of the English language. I recommend taking 1st through 6th grades again and this time pay attention.
1st statement-I was accusing you and a few other members of having tunnel vision and being afraid to discuss something other than the buick "231cid" powerplant, t-type ,gn ,gnx, we4 and so on!
Did you even READ the SRT-4 post?! You aren't very observant if you didn't notice me talking about vehicles other than the GN.
Good job on listing the vehicles that have the 3.8! Want a cookie? Did somehow think I didn't know what cars the 3.8T are in? Sounds like you are proud of this fact and love parading it around like the little "special" boy who just found out where babies come from.
2nd statement I was saying you don't have the right to call"Bull$hit" on me cause you don't even know what Rx7 I was speaking of!you don't know whether the rx7 I was refering to is Aspec or Jspec, I never mentioned what rx-7,the year, the type. So if you don't know what rx7 I was speaking of then you can respond! The rx-7 r1 and 2 spirit both consectivly run low 13._ _ rated at 280hp(restricted emissions) with a stock bigger turbo and intercooler...also there is a 3 rotor rx-7 that is even quicker!
Congratulations, you got me!! You're so clever with that bait and switch crap. Again, sounding like a retard..."HA HA! I MEANT THE OTHER ONE! DURRRR"
I was talking Aspec, and no stock USDM RX-7 runs 12s. Again, want a cookie for knowing JDM ****?
3rd statement I was saying that 13.7 is possible in a s2k and you said it would be "THE ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM UNDER BEST POSSIBLE CIRCUMSTANCES POSSIBLE TIME" and I was was saying who If you still don't understand then your just dumb and I can't do nothing for yatests a cars performance in bad circumstances!LOL! and even if it was tested in a place that would allow it to achieve times better than average so what the s2k still acheived those times!
Show me this 13.7 timeslip on a stock s2k. That's like saying LS1 f-bodies run 12s because a couple have run 12.9x.
4th statement I was saying the 2002 ws6 runs mid-high 12s stock it takes nothing to get a f-body to run low 12's
Again you're full of ****. Have you seen these 12-second STOCK timeslips or are you just talking out of your ass again?
5th statement I was saying you were a tool that had no idea of what you were talking about....because the rear suspension of the z DOES squat under hard acceleration due to the load and design of the springs...
I've talked with guys who own 400+hp Zs and take them regularly to the track, and they said that the BIGGEST DETRIMENT TO THE Z's TRACTION IS THE REAR SUSPENSION. Nissan designed it for road racing, not drag racing.
6th statement I was saying the 300zx has excellent traction at high, mid or low speeds there is nothing sucky about the traction on these cars.!PERIOD! don't belive me? go drive and tune a z for 3 years or ask someone who knows the history and capablities of a Z and stop reading "Sport Compact Car" Like its the bible!
Have you actually tuned a Z for three years or again, are you just the little tard boy that hangs out at the local tuner's place and dry-humps that big, bad Z sitting in the garage and regurgitates all the bull**** info the techs there feed you for ****s n' giggles? I've seen mildly tuned Zs break traction at 60mph, where's your "excellent mid speed traction" then?
Where did I ever mention SCC?
7th statement I was saying the 300z is not limited to a gt car...you can make a 300zx into anything you want from a big balla car to a 1/4 mile dominator, to a well handling tourer the high end japanese imports like the 300zx, 350z, sc300T, supra, skyline, s2k, rx7, stealth, 3000gtvr4 and Nsx are capable to dominating any type of performance bracket they aren't restricted to any one class of racing!!!
And where was I saying the Z COULDN'T be made into any of those? Show me. Now.
Fact is, the Z isn't going to dominate the 1/4 until it gets a solid rear axle swapped in.
Are you somehow trying to say that American cars can't be dominating any of those? There you go again with spouting off car types like it makes you some ****ing rocket scientist.
last statement I was saying that if you know what your doing ITS NOT HARD TO WORK ON A 300ZX, engine bay or other wise! don't be scared of a challenge or to learn something differant! Only Pu$$ies pay someone else to work on their cars! Is that what you are?
I can't afford to pay other people to work on my car and being afraid of a challenge. You still miss my point that the Z HAS A F(CKING PACKED ENGINE BAY AND TO EVEN CHANGE TURBOS YOU NEED TO PULL THE ENGINE. Do you need to pull the engine to change turbos on a GN? On a DSM? SRT-4? No.
Next time you step to "The Don" have a better arsenal tool! LOL!
Newsflash: referring to yourself in 3rd person is incredibly gay. I'll be sure next time I "step" to you, Mr. E-Thug, I'll "bring it" and pop a cap in yo' ass, ok?