Bush did nothing about terrorism!

[Red Regal T]

Democrats sent out another hit man against the President with a bunch of unsubstantiated claims that the Bush did nothing about terrorism. I wonder how long we'll have to listen to this crap from the left wing media, spouting all this nonsense from some nobody who is only interested in selling a book. As I said before, these people have no integrity. Tell enough big, outrageous lies, and the "sheep" will believe.

 

[Drew L]

That's the problem half truths

Especially when actors like Penn speak. Many people don't have an opinion one way or the other on many topics then all of a suddden something one of these clowns says "catches their eye" then it becomes fact. This drive by style politics is very damaging and has no teeth whatsoever. Drew

 

[UNGN]

The Same guy that had the GPS Coordinates and a Visual (Via Predator Drone) of Osama Bin Ladin Real time, both before and after the Cole Bombing (a year before 9/11) is blaming Bush for not doing enough against Terrorism.

Richard Clarke is an advisor to Kerry and has a book coming out this week. If this was really important, wouldn't this have come out YEARS AGO, when it actually happened, and not the week of his book release?

 

[Red Regal T]

All I hear about on the news, is how the campaigns are really getting dirty. Let's see.........Bush attacked Iraq for political gain, he's a traitor, he's a deserter, he's a liar, all irresponsible attacks against the Commander in chief. The Republicans, on the other hand, getting really down and dirty, counter with the fact that, Kerry flip-flops on just about everything that comes in front of him and even show glimpses of 9/11 in their ads. Gosh..........the Republicans are downright EVIL.

 

[1badTTA]

Originally posted by Red Regal T
All I hear about on the news, is how the campaigns are really getting dirty. Let's see.........Bush attacked Iraq for political gain, he's a traitor, he's a deserter, he's a liar, all irresponsible attacks against the Commander in chief. The Republicans, on the other hand, getting really down and dirty, counter with the fact that, Kerry flip-flops on just about everything that comes in front of him and even show glimpses of 9/11 in their ads. Gosh..........the Republicans are downright EVIL.

Ditto, how many sheep can there be???

 

[CARTMAN]

Originally posted by Red Regal T
As I said before, these people have no integrity. Tell enough big, outrageous lies, and the "sheep" will believe.

Your still talking about the democrats right?

 

[JDSfastGN]

Man you are the most blinded biased individual I think I've ever heard. Do you actually believe that there is one side that is good (the republicans) verses the evil empire (the democrats). They are all polititions and both sling a lot of mud and tell big lies. The Republicans are no different when they are trying to knock the incumbent out of office. Bush and his administration have lied and deceived just as every administration has. Bush didn't do a lot before 9/11, no more than was deemed nessasary by his advisors just like the previous administrations.

 

[Red Regal T]

Originally posted by JDSfastGN
Do you actually believe that there is one side that is good (the republicans) verses the evil empire (the democrats).

Yes, I absolutely believe democrats and left wingers have NO integrity. They make it up as they go along. I can tell because they all say the same baloney. Everytime I turn around they have more outrageous lies. We're at war and the left's agenda is to simply get back into power while the Republicans, lead by GW, are trying to deal with the enemy and protect America. Bush didn't do much before 9/11 because he was only in office for 8 months. Clinton didn't do anything but lie, for 8 years. What a pathetic record. Kerry is a joke. Democrats ARE pathetic.

 

[JDSfastGN]

wow, im not even gonna argue, u have your veiw and you didn't dodge my question. I completely disagree, I think you believe to much republican propaganda and aren't looking at the big picture but thats whats great about living here We can have different views.

 

[UNGN]

I'm tired of people's hardback book releases being considered "Front Page News", especially when the TV network putting it on the front page also owns the publishing company that is releasing the book.

If Rupert Murdock had done this, the left wing would be beside themselves.

 

[1000MileStylez]

One thing im truly pissed off about is that bush is saving the capture of osama bin laden for his up coming election. Just get the bastard and end it already.

 

[trading t/a]

If any of you are vets IMHO you'll prolly get to use some of the skills learned through service soon. I just hope that we have a republican in office when this all goes down. Both sides are corrupt and are run by the almighty dollar, however I would rather my tax dollars go to a healthy military than sickened one.

This country was founded so that all people could have equal rights under the constitution. In essence a classless society. In England aristocratic families were above the law and treated differently from peasants. This country has morphed into the same society that it tried to break away from. There is a very fine line in political parties currently. It is a good ole boy network in which they protect their own.

It is truly quite sad when you elect people to represent you then they get in and make their own agenda. Both parties are guilty of this, they went even as far as forcing the competition out of politics. 200 years ago it wasn't unheard of to have a federalist, libertarian, and independent running for office. Nowadays they've restricted the funding these parties get in order to wage a campaign for office. Kinda like picking your own poison.

Very slowly over the years this government has taken the rights from the people it is supossed to serve. One is the right to arm yourself. It has nothing to do with hunting or home protection! It was solely created for the people to free themselves from an opressing government. Now you need permits, cards and pretty much a congressional mandate to own one. Could it be they're worried what an armed society could do to their cushy posistions(see aristocracy above).

Please think when it comes time to elect your officials. It's nice that we have a hobby, but by electing these people you may very well give up the rights you have and we wont have a hobby to entertain us.

 

[Red Regal T]

Originally posted by 1000MileStylez
One thing im truly pissed off about is that bush is saving the capture of osama bin laden for his up coming election. Just get the bastard and end it already.

This statement just proves the extent of the left wing propoganda flying around.

It's easy to be cynical of politicians. We all know that the people with the bucks run everything. But even in those people, like all groups, you have good and bad. Some people love and appreciate this country, and some people don't. For those that love this country, as George Bush does, that love is never so intense, as when we are under attack by a foreign enemy. We are in that situation now, and have been since 9/11, and for years before, we stoodbye and took attacks, and did nothing. Now, we are experiencing great leadership in this time of war. One would think we would gather behind our leader in a single mindset against the enemy. But no! What I see are a bunch of people, the democrat leadership, pulling down our leader simply to get back into power. How sorry can you get? Again, I'll say they have no integrity and no honor. They don't care that much about our country. They would side with the weasel French. It's not even......."well we disagree with this or that". It's outrageous personal attacks and lies everytime you turn on the tube. They exalt in American set backs in the war and in the economy even though things are getting better. Sadly, they use the number of soldiers killed or wounded only as a tool to regain power. They really don't care at all except for that reason. You only have to watch them to see how pathetic and they are.

 

[GN SBS]

Originally posted by UNGN

Richard Clarke is an advisor to Kerry and has a book coming out this week. If this was really important, wouldn't this have come out YEARS AGO, when it actually happened, and not the week of his book release?

Let's not forget that Clarke has served under presidents of both parties, including Ronald Reagan. He's not some liberal whacko.

There is lots of liberal bunk out there, but why assume this is more of the same? I haven't read the book, but without doing so it seems just a tad premature to write it off in entirety.


-S.

 

[UNGN]

Originally posted by GN SBS
Let's not forget that Clarke has served under presidents of both parties, including Ronald Reagan. He's not some liberal whacko.

There is lots of liberal bunk out there, but why assume this is more of the same? I haven't read the book, but without doing so it seems just a tad premature to write it off in entirety.


-S.

I didn't say he was a "Liberal Whacko", I said that Book releases are not front page news. The book was written about stuff that happened 3 years ago. Why wasn't it news then?

Clarke says all Bush could think about after 911 was Iraq. So why did we we attack Afghanistan and wait nearly 2 years to attack Iraq?

Mansoor Ijaz, the guy that negotiated Sudan's handing over of Bin Laden to Clinton in 1997, said Clarke's book was written to cover Clarke's ass and said he would debate Clarke about any of it's content's disparaging the Bush administration's war on terror.

Why would he want to cover his ass? Who bombed the aspirin factory in the Sudan on the basis of flawed intelligence? Richard Clarke. I wonder if that made the book. Hmmm... A pre-emptive strike on a "state Sponsor of terror" that was based on a "lie". Where have I heard that before

Clarke hasn't told anyone that he was "out of the loop" post 9/11 (he was) or that the network making his book front page news is owned by the same parent company selling his book (it is). He's not even telling everybody that he thought IRAQ had WMD's and he knew Iraq was a state sponsor of terrorism (he did).

He's not a whacko Liberal, but is he, like Paul Oneill, an egotistical, self promoting government hack, who was never wrong about anything? you decide.

If he is or he isn't, it's NOT front page news. Not even on a slow newsday.