G-tech Pro Anybody Ever Compare Numbers

[charlloots]

WHATS UP GUYS ? ANYBODY EVER COMPARE G-TECH NUMBERS WITH TRACK NUMBERS? ARE THEY COMPARIBLE AND WHAt OTHER INFORMATION WILL G-TECH GIVE YOU? THANKS FOR ANY INFO.

CHARLLOOTS
WE4

 

[blackbuick87]

It gives estimated hp, lateral g's, 0-60, 1/4, 60'.

I have one but have not used it yet, too many friggin car problems

 

[bruce]

Originally posted by charlloots
WHATS UP GUYS ? ANYBODY EVER COMPARE G-TECH NUMBERS WITH TRACK NUMBERS? ARE THEY COMPARIBLE AND WHAt OTHER INFORMATION WILL G-TECH GIVE YOU? THANKS FOR ANY INFO.

It's a tuning aid.
It's not a replacement for a drag strip.

The error depends on you combo, so will vary from car to car.

I have lots of runs on one.
Turn the boost down a little so you don't blow the tires off, and it can be a huge aid in launching and all but the last bit of WOT tuning.

 

[BLACK6PACK]

When everything is set up right, they are right on the numbers with the actuall time. Took it to the track and in about 5 runs the biggest difference between the g-tech and the time slip was .06 seconds. The mph is always high due to the g-tech measuring it right at the 1/4 mark and the track averages it out over the last 60' (?).

 

[charlloots]

thanks for the input think im gonna get one .
charlloots
we4

 

[Brooks]

Before you spend your money take a look at the new G-Tech and at the Tazzo.

I opted for the Tazzo and am satisfied with it but that was before the new G-Tech unit was released and I never got a chance to play with the new G-Tech model.



Charles Brooks

 

[Joe 1320]

I ran my g-tech pro at the strip. The ET was pretty darn close. Typically the g-tech was about a 1/10th slow compared to the timers. The MPH was off by a good margin. Easily a consistant 5 mph faster than the strip timers. It's cool looking at a 0-60 of 3.2 seconds.

 

[J Banning]

Originally posted by BLACK6PACK
When everything is set up right, they are right on the numbers with the actuall time. Took it to the track and in about 5 runs the biggest difference between the g-tech and the time slip was .06 seconds. The mph is always high due to the g-tech measuring it right at the 1/4 mark and the track averages it out over the last 60' (?).

That's about the same as we found. It's a neat little device... the new one looks even cooler.

-Banning.

 

[GNASH]

Everytime I have tried it at the track, it is out by less than 0.10. Mph is high of course, but an amazing tuning tool to have none the less.

D

 

[charlloots]

Originally posted by Brooks
Before you spend your money take a look at the new G-Tech and at the Tazzo.

I opted for the Tazzo and am satisfied with it but that was before the new G-Tech unit was released and I never got a chance to play with the new G-Tech model.



Charles Brooks

whats the difference with tazzo ?
did you compare with track numbers ?


charlloots
we4