all things being equal what was the perf. difference between both heads. Was the gain significant ?
I don't have back to back data so I will give my best answer. It wasn't worth it for what I've seen
but I've also been chasing down AFR problems which I've just now corrected. You can make you own conclusion by reading below.
Iron headed combo up until 2005:
The average time the car ran with the stock block, stock crank, stock ported heads, stock ported intake and 2 1/2 stock intercoolers (tied together), ATR 214-210 roller & 70 P trim turbo was somewhere in the 6.70's at 102-105. This was with 30psi of boost with the car weighing 3450lb. Below is the best timeslips with that combo...
1.453 6.536 107.392
1.479 6.617 106.253
1.548 6.624 106.324
1.536 6.673 104.942
1.583 6.680 107.078
1.548 6.735 105.376
1.554 6.776 103.455
1.617 6.777 105.512
1.530 6.783 101.936
1.534 6.797 101.898
1.515 6.806 102.611
1.532 6.813 101.369
1.562 6.847 101.786
1.671 6.853 106.071
1.574 6.867 99.747
1.685 6.875 106.121
1.652 6.877 104.321
Aluminum headed combo 2006:
Unfortunately, I haven't run the car too much with the GN1-R's because of AFR problems I
was chasing down. I changed 3 things since those times above....the heads, the intake and the intercooler...all three are still on the car. I was still using the same 70 P trim turbo and ATR roller cam. The best run was a 6.69 at 104 with 25psi of boost with unstable AFR's. The car also weighed more... about 3580lb. So, I guess I can say that running 5psi less boost and the car weighing 130lbs more these changes helped.
Since the above aluminum headed times, I've a added a FAST XFI... which fixed my AFR problems and added a stroker crank and a 220-224 cam.