By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!turbofish38 said:The correct way to measure is from a point on the frame to the ground. If those numbers are off than the frame is tweaked. Quite common on GM frames even when these cars were new and more so now that they are 20 years old. They also like to rust where the body mounts rub on top of the frame. When that happens the body sinks down at that point.
------------------------YRUSOSLO said:So can this be repaired by a body shop with a frame machine? My frame is 3/16" higher on the passenger side. It doesn't sound like much but you can really notice it from behind the car. TIA
Wells said:------------------------
3/16 (.1875) is a pretty insignificant amount for anybody to be able to visually distinguish from nominal, so I would guess that you have other issues that you are holding the frame accountable for. What are you using to determine that the car is off visually from the rear, ie. top of fender to top of fender at rear, bumper, rub strip, ??.
---------------------------YRUSOSLO said:My mistake, I meant to type 3/8" not 3/16" difference, based on the frame measurement with the car parked on a level garage floor. Measured at the rear wheel well opening it's 7/16" higher on the passenger side. The front is fairly close side to side measuring frame to floor and wheel well opening to floor. Visually it's most noticeable when you are standing directly behind the car. Walking around the car you can see a larger gap between the rear tire and wheel well opening on the passenger side compared to the drivers side. I plan on having the body bushings replaced and take it from there. If the frame is tweaked as Eric suggested, should I take it to a body shop or put rear coilovers on it? I want it to sit a little lower in the rear anyway and I figured I could use coilovers to adjust the ride height and compensate for the lean at the same time. Thanks for your input guys!