cheeshead revenge

[tom j]

Go BEARS
YouTube - cheese head revenge

 

[jetmech]

oh yeah

 

[Brer Rabbit]

Retard Packer Fans.

I really think they believe that nonsense, cuz in the game yesterday the entire stadium starting yelling "The bears still suck" right after Urlacher picked off the pass, then on the next play they were silenced when Olsen punked out that defensive back and caught the touchdown pass. " It was a BEEEEYOUUTIFUL thing my friend. Theres nothing better than watching 4 fat Packer fan women with a collective weight of 1,200 pounds jumping around thinking they look hot and sexy. And whats with the kicking away from Hester. I say play the game and kick off to him and if U cant stop him, then get some guys that can. So who sucks now Green Bay? I love it I love it! :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin: :biggrin:

 

[IrvJr]

Hell yeah. I watched the game with my Packer loving brother in law. His dad called from MI after the first td to rub it in. I took it in good stride, and i didnt rub it in when we waxed them thru the 2nd half.

 

[BlackBandit]

The Bears do still suck. They sucked last year and they suck this year. There's a reason they get waxed every time they play a good team. As far as Sundays game goes the Bears won. They got some very favorable calls, but in my opinion the bottom line is that even though this year the Pack is a better team (yes I'm a Packer fan) they weren't good enough to pull through the setbacks. Championship teams don't help the other team and they overcome bad officiating. There's still ALLOT of football left and come December 23 I bet Jones doesn't fumble any footballs!

Also, Olsen didn't punk any defensive backs. If fact, all he did was run a route. The linebacker bit on a play fake and the db (safety) reacted wrong. That wasn't skill on greg olsens part, that was a well executed play action by the QB and the RB. But that's why I love Bears fans.:biggrin:

 

[yamla_jatt806]

The Bears do still suck. They sucked last year and they suck this year. There's a reason they get waxed every time they play a good team. As far as Sundays game goes the Bears won. They got some very favorable calls, but in my opinion the bottom line is that even though this year the Pack is a better team (yes I'm a Packer fan) they weren't good enough to pull through the setbacks. Championship teams don't help the other team and they overcome bad officiating. There's still ALLOT of football left and come December 23 I bet Jones doesn't fumble any footballs!

Also, Olsen didn't punk any defensive backs. If fact, all he did was run a route. The linebacker bit on a play fake and the db (safety) reacted wrong. That wasn't skill on greg olsens part, that was a well executed play action by the QB and the RB. But that's why I love Bears fans.:biggrin:

Your team just lost to the Bears and they still suck, yeah...right...sore loser. The Bears sucked so much last year that they made it all the way to the Super Bowl.

 

[BlackBandit]

If the Raiders play the Browns and win are they a good team? It seams like I said the Bears won and I didn't say they didn't deserve to. They did. Why the animosity? Lets face it. The Bears have a secondary with no continuity. That means 1/3 of there strongest faze is weak at best. They have something special with Hester but he has some liabilities that are often ignored. Their offense consists of two average receivers, a running back that so far is a bust, an aging offensive line and a choice of quarterbacks that's either average and aging or young and, well, let's just say it's not a good thing when the opposing team WANTS him in. Since I'm not a sore loser I'll say it one more time for you because I know the bandwagon is crowded. The Bears DESERVED to win that game. I just don't think they're a good team. You don't hear me saying the Pack have a great shot at going all the way do you?

 

[Brer Rabbit]

I love ur breakdown on my Bears..

If the Raiders play the Browns and win are they a good team? It seams like I said the Bears won and I didn't say they didn't deserve to. They did. Why the animosity? Lets face it. The Bears have a secondary with no continuity. That means 1/3 of there strongest faze is weak at best. They have something special with Hester but he has some liabilities that are often ignored. Their offense consists of two average receivers, a running back that so far is a bust, an aging offensive line and a choice of quarterbacks that's either average and aging or young and, well, let's just say it's not a good thing when the opposing team WANTS him in. Since I'm not a sore loser I'll say it one more time for you because I know the bandwagon is crowded. The Bears DESERVED to win that game. I just don't think they're a good team. You don't hear me saying the Pack have a great shot at going all the way do you?

It seems to be just an opinion to anyone who follows the Bears as closely as I do. Ur point about the secondary being weak is only half true because Vasher didnt play and I know ur not gonna say anything negative about Tillman----hes the reason why we were in a position to win it late. That game is a blowout by mid 2nd quarter if he doesnt end those two drives by forcing those fumbles. I personally feel that Vasher is a better cover man than Tillman, and the two of them are just as good if not better than ur two starting defensive backs that get so much praise. I know they are younger than Woodson for sure. U were absolutely correct on our O line. They do not look good which goes back to last year. They cannot run block at all and get pushed back into the pocket when pass blocking. Thats why Benson is not running for big yardage. One more thing...Do u think the packer receivers are more than average? I don't. The rookie that fumbled twice should be benched. Hopefully Brett goes away after this year than Greenbay will be a non factor for a long time.

 

[BlackBandit]

Well, when I referred to your secondary I was mainly talking about the safety issues the Bears have had and are having. Are Vasher and Tillman as good as Harris and Woodson? Maybe. Two different defensive styles so it's hard to say. I would have to see them in a bump and run coverage. The only other way would be statistically and again, two different schemes. I do know that during the last game only one pass was caught by a Bears receiver that was covered by Harris or Woodson. That's pretty impressive. And so you don't have to say it so were the two fumbles that Tillman forced. As far as the Packs receivers go I would have to sum it up like this. Driver is a pro-bowl receiver (last year) that routinely turns in 1000 yard seasons despite playing double covered for a large portion of most games. Jennings was on pace for a 1000 yard season his rookie year before he got injured and Jones, excepting those two fumbles has been playing at the level of an apt 2nd or 3rd year receiver and is on pace for a 1000 yard season. (He's a rookie) So I would say Driver is definitely above average and I'm inclined to say that if Jennings and Jones, who are second and first year guys respectively, are putting up above average numbers then they are qualifying as above average receivers. How much of that is Bret? Time will tell. they definitely are not in the elite (moss, owens) category, that's for sure. But I would take Driver over Muhammed any day. Maybe over Berrian if it was just for the season. (Berrian is younger so for team building he would be the obvious choice) As far as Bret going away and the Pack being a non-factor that may or may not be true. Rodgers looked good for the first time this preseason and Chicago has proven that you don't need a great QB to win some games, especially in a division as weak as ours.