You can type here any text you want

Electromotive??

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Talk to Mean Scott...maybe you dont know him....Scott Simpson (Scott231 on here). I believe he has an older TEC setup in his GN goin mid 10's
 
The proper link is http://www.electromotive-inc.com With the advent of the 7th generation of the DFI from Accel, I would at least wait until the TEC-4 comes out with wide-band capability. That is if you are wanting to be serious about racing the car.

(link and spelling corrected 11-10-02)
 
Originally posted by Scott231
The proper link is http://www.electomive-inc.com Witht he advent of the 7th generation of the DFI from Accel, I would at least wait until the TEC-4 comes out with wide-band capability. that is if you are wanting to be serious about racing the car.

And if you're really serious, the WB is immaterial.
While having one to monitor the system can be nice, WB feedback is going one step too far with current technology in my book.

BTW, at one time there were a few fast mustangs using boost and the GM Syclone ecm. clever hidden in them.......
 
LOL :)

Anyway, the TEC3 sw seems easier to understand than the TEC2, they've added a "VE table", sorta ;), but still use a confusing base approach with their UAP and POT and so called "linear dynamics". But it looks workable if you just can't swing a FAST with the integrated, immaterial wb. Or a haltech would do the same thing with just a basic inj pw vs speed and load mapping.

The tough part of the above is getting it mapped correctly.

If you're going to bother to do it, just do it right and get the FAST though. It will be alot easier to tune, for starters.

JMO.

Sent you a pm.

TurboTR
 
Back
Top