bttwracing86T
YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE 6!
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 485
Which is better
Posted from the TurboBuick.Com mobile app
Posted from the TurboBuick.Com mobile app
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!All pumps used with current available systems in the aftermarket use Santoprene as the rubber in the diaphragm. Santoprene has a poor rating with petroleum.. especially fuel.I've had some guys use M5, they said it made a world of difference in power. I don't know exactly how much but I'm going to test it back to back with M1 as soon as my car is back together. I know you're not supposed to mix M5 with water based on the lubricants. These guys were using the Snow pumps though I'm sure the same people make most of popular brands. It was only done on a couple of tanks full so probably not enough to notice any wear in the pumps or anything else.
You haven't made the point that it makes more power. You commented that others have said it makes more power but have posted no evidence of this.It is what it is. The guys know the risks. I was just trying to make the point that M5 makes more power. If it takes another pump to sustain being able to pump M5 so be it. Pumps are cheap these days.
Anyone could say that. To me a world of difference would be like 30-40% more power. Like when adding a 125hp shot of nitrous to an engine or performing a heads, cam exhaust change to a car. Those things when dialed in will tuly make a world of difference. An A-B-A test proving it like when i proved the 50/50 water/meth lost 4% power with no other changes on the dyno. I couldn't "feel" the 4% in the butt dyno but it sure was there. Boost, timing, and targets remained almost identical while testing. I was only looking for differences by diluting the alky with no other changes. Believe me I want to believe it makes a world of difference but based on what I have done and documented with different fuels Id need to see proof of it before I believed what someone else said. To get a world of difference while keeping everything else constant would require getting more oxygen into the cylinder via the fuel. The instant I see proof I'll be doing it myself and just look into another material to have the pump parts made out of so they are compatible with the m5.Bison, I guess you missed the part about the guys saying it made a world of difference in power. I'm going to follow it up with actual data that can be measured.
In case you didn't notice you posted in the tech forum. Not the whine forum. I'm here to make sure that the information posted is accurate. So with that said your last post indicates who the "jack ass" is. So keep your jack ass comments out of the tech forum or they will be deleted and you will be also. If you don't like it then go find some other forum and post it there. If you want to be beneficial to the community then do a controlled test and post the result. Have a nice dayOk whatever dude. Do you just troll around high jacking people's threads looking for places to insert jacka** comments? I don't care what a world of difference is to you, I was trying to be beneficial to the OP. If it wasn't beneficial now, it will be when I get the car back together and put it on the dyno.
PerfectRazor, can you let me know if this is OK for your setup? I never new there was a difference. It just says methanol on the tag but then there is some other numbers.