Sep 14, 2006 #1 L Little6pack Active Member Joined Jun 2, 2002 Messages 11,676 http://www.gm.com/company/corp_info/history/gmhis1970.html & http://www.gm.com/company/corp_info/history/gmhis1980.html
http://www.gm.com/company/corp_info/history/gmhis1970.html & http://www.gm.com/company/corp_info/history/gmhis1980.html
Sep 14, 2006 #2 Z zeus87gn Automotive Neurosurgeon Joined Oct 14, 2005 Messages 2,036 Well, the Powermaster was mentioned in 1984.
Sep 14, 2006 #3 R Randy Greenoe Member Joined May 24, 2001 Messages 1,246 zeus87gn said: Well, the Powermaster was mentioned in 1984. Click to expand... Guys are still talking about them today! They refer to them as "That G. D. Powermaster"
zeus87gn said: Well, the Powermaster was mentioned in 1984. Click to expand... Guys are still talking about them today! They refer to them as "That G. D. Powermaster"
Sep 15, 2006 #4 T turbofish38 Le Pétomane Joined Dec 3, 2002 Messages 6,160 zeus87gn said: Well, the Powermaster was mentioned in 1984. Click to expand... I'm still trying to figure out the "fuel saving" description of the PM. How much fuel was used to create vacuum for the NA booster and how many extra MPG did a TR get by using a PM?
zeus87gn said: Well, the Powermaster was mentioned in 1984. Click to expand... I'm still trying to figure out the "fuel saving" description of the PM. How much fuel was used to create vacuum for the NA booster and how many extra MPG did a TR get by using a PM?