TIMINATOR
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
- Messages
- 939
IMHO disk brakes stop well, but have less holding power. Footbrake stall and launch boost drop. It does make burnouts easier without a line lock though. But then again with less spool, stall, and boost you wouldn't need as much traction anyway!
The opposite of this is using S-10 larger rear wheel cylinders to increase rear brake bias and holding power to raise footbrake stall and launch boost with your stock brakes. Soft linings, along with lengthened shoe area helps a bunch too.
This is one more reason that a bolt in 9" has another advantage that I haven't seen mentioned here, but I am a noob, just here, not in life or turbo cars. The ability to run any interchangeable wheel cylinder size from about 7/8" to I think, 1 3/16"!!!!!
Not to mention stock GN rear brakes are 10"× 2", and the most common, but still not the largest, ford car brakes are 11"× 2 1/4"! That raises the footbrake stall and launch boost quite a bit, and allows for higher boost/ spool street launches with a tighter convertor.
The other deal is with the taller 9" housing, the upper control arm mounts are raised in relation to axle center line, that reduces the traction killing "squat on launch" characteristic that you have to add stiff shocks and airbags to counteract. On my H.P. g bodies, old chevelles, and ford cars, I lower the upper front control arm mounts with several holes from 1 1/4" to 2 1/2" lower to allow for instant center changes.
Whenever I have time to have Chuck walk me thru pic uploading, I will post before and after launch pics. Until then, think about my 1972 Big Block Chevelle street car running high 9s in 1990, on 295/50 street tires (garbage compared to today's tires) with the front wheels up a foot!
TIMINATOR
The opposite of this is using S-10 larger rear wheel cylinders to increase rear brake bias and holding power to raise footbrake stall and launch boost with your stock brakes. Soft linings, along with lengthened shoe area helps a bunch too.
This is one more reason that a bolt in 9" has another advantage that I haven't seen mentioned here, but I am a noob, just here, not in life or turbo cars. The ability to run any interchangeable wheel cylinder size from about 7/8" to I think, 1 3/16"!!!!!
Not to mention stock GN rear brakes are 10"× 2", and the most common, but still not the largest, ford car brakes are 11"× 2 1/4"! That raises the footbrake stall and launch boost quite a bit, and allows for higher boost/ spool street launches with a tighter convertor.
The other deal is with the taller 9" housing, the upper control arm mounts are raised in relation to axle center line, that reduces the traction killing "squat on launch" characteristic that you have to add stiff shocks and airbags to counteract. On my H.P. g bodies, old chevelles, and ford cars, I lower the upper front control arm mounts with several holes from 1 1/4" to 2 1/2" lower to allow for instant center changes.
Whenever I have time to have Chuck walk me thru pic uploading, I will post before and after launch pics. Until then, think about my 1972 Big Block Chevelle street car running high 9s in 1990, on 295/50 street tires (garbage compared to today's tires) with the front wheels up a foot!
TIMINATOR