Still support Bush and would vote form him?

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Still support Bush and will vote for him?

  • Yes, I support him and Will vote for him in 2004

    Votes: 90 78.9%
  • No, Bush isn't getting the job done

    Votes: 24 21.1%

  • Total voters
    114

Gothmog

Lieutenant of Morgul
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Messages
15,943
I was talking to a friend who doesn't know ANYONE who still supports Bush. I told him that his support is still strong in "middle America" not NYC. So I'm just testing my theory. This thread isn't intended to start a debate or revert to name calling. Please.
 
Something I've been wondering lately...
How many of you feel safer now?

Kind of a vague question, but you know what I'm getting at.
 
Originally posted by Gothmog


I was talking to a friend who doesn't know ANYONE who still supports Bush.


Sounds like something similar to the Clinton years...it was nearly impossible over the 8 years to find anyone who would admit to voting for him...but by some "sinister force" he was there for 2 longggggggg terms...weird!! :eek: :eek: :confused: :eek: :eek:
 
Let's see what the other choices are. But I'll vote for bush again over Gore...:mad:
 
i for one, support bush 100% and think he is doing a good job considering all the sh&t thats been going on. i will absolutley vote for him again. all this crap with people against him, and whats wrong with one nation under god. this is one nation under god . sorry but if you dont like oh well.:D
 
Absolutely. I support our President. And Two Lane, I hear you! I always wondered how that dumb$hit got elected when no-one I've talked to admits to having voted for him. Hell, I voted for Perot :eek:
 
Originally posted by Gothmog
I was talking to a friend who doesn't know ANYONE who still supports Bush. I told him that his support is still strong in "middle America" not NYC. So I'm just testing my theory. This thread isn't intended to start a debate or revert to name calling. Please.

Seems as if your freind is not talking to the "RIGHT" people......sorry couldn't resist:D The polls still show his approval rating at 59% and I think the man is doing a great job considering what he inherited when he took office...........whoops sorry for the potshot against Clinton........but truth:D
 
Originally posted by Dan K
Something I've been wondering lately...
How many of you feel safer now?

To answer that question you'd have to know how you'd feel with Saddam and the Taliban still in power.

If other terrorist attacks have been prevented by virtue of what Dubya has accomplished, how could you know?

We are better off with the Taliban and Saddam gone, no doubt about it.
 
It amazes me how so many people think one man is responsable for everything that happens in this country. Every time something goes wrong, it's the President's fault. :rolleyes: The general American public is so quick to put blame somewhere when something goes wrong that we'll point the finger at the easiest target without stopping to use our (supposedly) educated brains to think about the situation and make informed decisions and statements. And the media sure has hell isn't any help,either, but don't get me started there. We're too lazy, folks. That's why voter turnout is less and less every year. There's so many people that don't want to do anything unless they can see a direct benfit to themselves. I'm sure glad our founding fathers weren't that way. What they went went through for our freedom and our own new country would shock most people. It did me. Check it out sometime.

A soft foriegn policy is what lead to the attack on Pearl Harbor and it happened again on 9/11. I'm proud of Bush's stand on foriegn policy and strongly believe it's needed in these times. I can't figure out what the hell the French and the Germans are doing. They seem to have forgotten the lessons of World War II. Saddam got what he deserved. If you're a good guy and not hiding anything you don't hassel weapons inspectors and spit in NATO's face. He flat asked for it whether there were weapons of mass destruction or not. NATO just stood there and rubbed the spit in their eyes so Bush and Tony Blair had to step up to the plate. A big high five to those guys!

And to those that want to blame our present economy on the President (no matter who he is), refer to what I first said about informed thinking. Remember 9/11? Did you know it had devastating effects on many aspects of our economy? I suppose you know how to make everything right anyway and are an authority on economics. That's what I thought. Go get another beer. < belch >
 
The question of "are you feel safer today vs two years ago" is not a question to base support on. Two years ago we had not been attack yet. Now that we have been, of course we aren't feeling safer. That has nothing to do with the President. My first thought is why didn't Clinton take advantage of the offers from the Saudi's and Sudan to arrest him for us when he was offered six times during the end of the 90's? Beware of poles, people are asked one question, and the polltakers deduct something total different.
 
I'd vote for him (AGAIN). I just don't feel as if I have any other options. The Dems are immoral, h0m0 lovin' freaks that only cater to special interests at the expense of the other 80% of us! GW has fallen slightly (for me) out of grace since trying to strip me of overtime and doing his d@mndest to remove health care from the middle class, but he has strong morals.
 
Hey Russ, companies are removing health care, not the government. If the government wasn't involved as much as it is in health care, prices would be much lower. That and the American public is partially to blame on health care. With the advent of health insurance for everything, people go to the doctors for the strangest thing and do it often. Used to you got a cold and you rested and took fluids, now days you go to the doctor, pay your low co-pay and have the doctor tell you the same thing your Mom used to tell you. I see the oddest things being covered by health insurance too.
The overtime thing is another thing that has been proposed, but hasn't been put thru either. We had a time in California until Gay Davis got in where your overtime was based on anything over 40 hours a week, not over 8 a day. The old 40 per week and then ot was what I grew up with.
All I know is the Democrats aren't what they were back in the early 60's, and neither are the Republicans. Rebuplicans sound more like Kennedy now, and the Democrats sound more like Marx and Lenon. MOH however. Mark:D
 
I would vote, but we don't know how to count votes here in Florida so what's the point?
 
I would be very interested in Clark if he joins the race.
 
I voted

Yes. Damn right. In fact he could NUKE them tommorrow and I would stand behind him in fact I would ask to throw the switch!;)

Bruce
WE4
Tb.com admin
 
Back
Top