Supercomps vs. aerochambers

[CanVan87GN]

My car currently has the Hooker Cat back with the Super Comp Mufflers. My intermediate pipes are fine but the tail pipes are terrible. I will be getting new tailpipes bent so my question is, should I keep the Super Comps or swith to Aerochambers? My current mufflers are in good shape so this will just cost me $100.00 to bend some pipes.........unless the aerochambers are that much better performance wise. Are the Super Comps free flow? They didn't look like it. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Cheers!

Shaun

 

[CanVan87GN]

TTT

Just a yes or no is all I ask Thanks

Shaun

 

[Two Lane]

ULTRAFLOWS

Yes...get the Ultraflows.

HTH

 

[8UWITH6]

aerochambers = quiet Nice for being discrete

 

[TheDoughboy]

My Hooker cat back came with the Aerochambers. To quiet for me, they seem just a tad louder then stock.

Ron

 

[CanVan87GN]

Good opinions..

Thanks guys for the tips I may look at ultraflows as well.

Shaun

 

[87GN_70GS]

Get the Hooker MaxFlows, flows 99% of an open pipe, straight-through construction.

 

[tracer]

I like the aerochamber. I've had ultraflows and several turbo style mufflers. Best mix of quiet and performance for me. You can see thru the aero's front to back, so I can't see how they would create too much back pressure.

 

[XLR8]

I wouldn't replace the mufflers if they are in good shape as I have not found them to be a restriction. I actually lose 1 mph when I open the dump instead of going through my Hooker cat back system.

 

[87GN_70GS]

Aerochambers flowed 441 cfm @ 28" vs 595 cfm for the MaxFlows.