matt69olds
Ain’t no feeling like Oldsmobling!
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 137
I have 2 th400 torn apart for friends, each with different problems.
First trans is in a 71 Camaro, 6.0 LS with big turbo on E85. Car runs high 8s and is street driven regularly. Buddy said it was starting to kinda slide into 3RD gear. Trans has CK Performance forward transbrake valve body, billet fwd clutch hub, aluminum ATI direct drum (6 clutches) 4 intermediate cliches, etc. My question, the first 4 frictions were smoked all the way to the steel discs, but only on the side closest to the piston. What could cause that?!?!?!
My other 400 is out of a low 10 second Chevelle. This one has a homemade fwd manual valve body. My question, I always replace the Teflon sealing rings on the 2nd accumulator piston. The piston always fits well on assembly, but after some run time the pistons fit really loose. I seems to me the sealing can’t be all that good, I have noticed the 4l80E did away with the Teflon rings in favor of rubber o-rings. Is this something that can be improved? Or am I being to picky? Thanks
First trans is in a 71 Camaro, 6.0 LS with big turbo on E85. Car runs high 8s and is street driven regularly. Buddy said it was starting to kinda slide into 3RD gear. Trans has CK Performance forward transbrake valve body, billet fwd clutch hub, aluminum ATI direct drum (6 clutches) 4 intermediate cliches, etc. My question, the first 4 frictions were smoked all the way to the steel discs, but only on the side closest to the piston. What could cause that?!?!?!
My other 400 is out of a low 10 second Chevelle. This one has a homemade fwd manual valve body. My question, I always replace the Teflon sealing rings on the 2nd accumulator piston. The piston always fits well on assembly, but after some run time the pistons fit really loose. I seems to me the sealing can’t be all that good, I have noticed the 4l80E did away with the Teflon rings in favor of rubber o-rings. Is this something that can be improved? Or am I being to picky? Thanks