You can type here any text you want

Timing and Turbin Failure

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Robert Kastle

New Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
81
I work for a large engine manufacturer and while at work I struck up a conversation with one of the mechanical engineers. The topic was turbin failure. Our engines are about the size of a TR stacked four high and alomost two deep.

What I learned was that to little timing is just as bad on a engine at a given power level as to much timing. Although to little is harder on the turbo and the engine. He mentioned that as the timing is retarded the exhaust temps go up. The headers start to work kind of like an afterburner on a jet,,, burning fuel as it leaves the cylinder. This will improve turbo response but possibly raise the turbin temps through the roof. He gave an example of a French built tank that would inject fuel directly into the exhaust system to quicken the turbo spool-up ( The Engine was a big failure ). He also mentioned that at a given hp level the engine with less timing is going to have to run more boost,,, working both the turbo and engine harder. The lower timing engine will more than likely have higher intake temps due to the higher boost and have possibly higher cylinder pressure for the same given power level. If the lower timing engine were to detonate it would be more likely also to blow a head gasket due to the higher boost levels run to maintain the power. The engine is also much less efficient at lower timing levels

Higher timing equals a more efficient engine,,, lower boost levels for a given hp level and lower exhaust temps.

Now is this true for all engines,,,,,, no. Each engine is a little different so they will not all respond to timing in the same manner.
You should want to tune to have the limits of the turbo (compressor and turbin),,, fuel and the engine converge at the same point.

The trick is that if the turbo limit is not reached to figure-out if the engine responds better to more timing or more boost but always keeping in mind the physical limit of the engine components.

I am one of those nuts that run 26* of timing on pump gas at 16lbs of boost . My car loves it and runs great with no knock. It runs stronger that way than it does with 20* and 20lbs of boost.
I run 32* of timing at the track. I run 115 mph in the quarter in a 3750lb car at 16lbs of boost with race gas. I am looking to lower that timing some,,,, but just a little.

I am no expert just passing on some info that I thought might be worth thinking about. I am an electrical engineer and I work with controls,,,, so when I have a question on engines I go down the hall to the mechanical guys. Most of which are all HOT RODDERs also,,, most of them are into Mustangs.
 
With the limited testing I've done (20, 22, and 24 deg on 93 octane), I agree that higher timing lower boost may make at least a little more power. And it's certainly true that if you go too low with the timing you can burn valves, cook the headers, and probably overheat and ruin the turbine. But (and this is a big but for me :-)), the tune is much more finicky with high timing. At 20 deg of timing with the boost right at the threshold of detonation so maybe one pass out of three you get 1 deg of retard and zero the rest of the time, if you add one psi boost you may get 1-3 deg of retard on two or all three passes. However, at 24 deg of advance if you add one psi of boost when you are already at the threshold, you will get 5-7 deg of retard on every pass. Same for fuel adjustments. The "cliff" is much steeper here :-). I personally don't think the slight bit of extra power (on my car, at least) is worth the risk, so I run 20 degrees of timing at wot.
 
I am far from an expert and after looking over my post I'm not a very good at spelling either.

I guess the way I see things is that with less boost you have less cylinder pressure and a cooler inlet charge. I have never ran my car over 20lbs. Before I would start running less timing I would want a way to monitor my exhaust temps.

The only part that I find hard to tune about my car is when I break the tires loose. If the car upshifts while I am out of the throttle and then I get back in the throttle and it down shifts,,, sometimes I see some knock retard.

Does any know what the max exhaust temperature of most turbos is? For our large engines its around 1250F*. Garrett Turbos.

Does anyone know what their exhaust temps are at say 20lbs of boost with a 20* chip?

It would be interesting to find out. I know there are some people that have had their turbos fail and It would be nice to find the root cause. I am interested because I am one of those people with a PTE52. I really have had good luck with mine and I like it alot. I'd like to keep it just the way it is,,, In one piece.

We had a turbo vender that did not machine the housings properly and under some conditions the wheels would contact the housing and fail.
 
Not sure on temps for those numbers, but with 27#s of boost and 25*timing my temps are around 1610 at teh end of a pass
That is running C16 fuel
 
I only get to run 1/8 mi. tracks & a good tune for me will see EGT's in the mid to upper 1600,s thru the traps. I'm sure i would back it down to low 1600's for the 1/4 mi. runs, maybee even high 1500's , allways a good idea to start conservative & tune more aggresive if the numbers look like the motor can handle it & you are picking up power.
 
1,800's about the limit.
On a Pulling tractor, I saw the telltale at ~2,000dF, and the turbine wheel had crystalized and exited the housing in about 2,000 pieces, oh, and ya, the housing was destroyed.

I'm sure if the engine had operated there much more then a few msec the exhaust valves and various other bits would have also self destructed.
 
Back
Top