I've been using a Snap-on scanner to monitor my vitals for many
years. It has a recordable function to review data after a run,
I think I usually get about 7-10 frames of useable data.
I was wondering if the Scanmaster had a record function also?
I see so many people using it, and wanted to know if I should
get one, or just stick with what I already have.
Does anybody else use the Snap-on???
years. It has a recordable function to review data after a run,
I think I usually get about 7-10 frames of useable data.
I was wondering if the Scanmaster had a record function also?
I see so many people using it, and wanted to know if I should
get one, or just stick with what I already have.
Does anybody else use the Snap-on???