Another " car value " question, so please pardon my "noobness ". My car is put up for its winter slumber, so I have a lot of time to ask stupid questions .
To me, these TB's fit in the class of "classic muscle cars" and by watching tv auctions such as Barrett-Jackson and Mecum , and checking prices online we all know the $values are steadily going up for muscle cars , in general. ( I almost cry when I see a '66 Chevelle SS 396 4spd convertible like the one I sold just before I married my first wife fetching almost a hundred grand . )
The "stock-unmolested" varieties also seem to have a sizable chunk of the interest of prospective buyers.
What I can't figure out is that I've seen cars with "patina" going for just as much (or more) as ones that have been repainted to showroom quality. I guess because they are no longer "unmolested" or stock ? And what is the real definition of "unmolested" anyway?
If I replace my rear upper and lower control arms with UMI parts and if I replace those danged body bushings and problem-plagued powermaster brake system does my GN lose some value as it's now "modified" ( I do plan on keeping the old control arms and powermaster parts ) I know, I know, it's my car and I can do what I want with it. I also know I don't plan on racing it, but having it handle and stop a little better sounds reasonable -- and safer.
It's just that driving a "time capsule" to a car show for display is kind of cool. The car does look like it just rolled out of the new car showroom -- especially underneath the body ( it was "ziebarted / rustproofed when new) and in the door jams and under hood.
BTW, I have it insured for an "agreed value" of $35k. My insurance agent didn't bat an eye on its value.
I would appreciate your opinions, especially from those with stock TB's or collectors.
To me, these TB's fit in the class of "classic muscle cars" and by watching tv auctions such as Barrett-Jackson and Mecum , and checking prices online we all know the $values are steadily going up for muscle cars , in general. ( I almost cry when I see a '66 Chevelle SS 396 4spd convertible like the one I sold just before I married my first wife fetching almost a hundred grand . )
The "stock-unmolested" varieties also seem to have a sizable chunk of the interest of prospective buyers.
What I can't figure out is that I've seen cars with "patina" going for just as much (or more) as ones that have been repainted to showroom quality. I guess because they are no longer "unmolested" or stock ? And what is the real definition of "unmolested" anyway?
If I replace my rear upper and lower control arms with UMI parts and if I replace those danged body bushings and problem-plagued powermaster brake system does my GN lose some value as it's now "modified" ( I do plan on keeping the old control arms and powermaster parts ) I know, I know, it's my car and I can do what I want with it. I also know I don't plan on racing it, but having it handle and stop a little better sounds reasonable -- and safer.
It's just that driving a "time capsule" to a car show for display is kind of cool. The car does look like it just rolled out of the new car showroom -- especially underneath the body ( it was "ziebarted / rustproofed when new) and in the door jams and under hood.
BTW, I have it insured for an "agreed value" of $35k. My insurance agent didn't bat an eye on its value.
I would appreciate your opinions, especially from those with stock TB's or collectors.