Brandon706
Member
rims look great
20 inch rims
- Thread starter turboreese415
- Start date
I kinda like the 20" rims although I will stick with my stock style for my GN. Glad others are doing what makes them happy. FWIW the math behind the extra brake load is complex but here is a basic pass at it. As mentioned earlier the moment of Inertia (I) is what is important here (rotational not reciprocating). Basic formula for a cylindrical disc is
I=1/2mr^2
and is a function of the wheel mass (m) and the radius (r). Those with keen eyes might say that a wheel isn't a a true cylindrical disc, and you would be right, as there are mass variations, but for the purposes of showing the effect of wheel diameter and because the actual math is stupid crazy this is the simple version.
Let's assume you can find a 20" rim that weighs the same as a 15" steel wheel that the stock brakes were designed for so the mass (m) is the same. This means that the moment of inertia for
Factory approximation:
m= 15 lb
r=15"/2" or 0.625'
I= 2.93 lb-ft^2
Sweet looking 20's
m=15 lb
r= 20"/2" or 0.833''
I= 5.21 lb-ft^2
This means you increased the moment of inertia with the same weight wheel by 77% by simply changing diameter.
Now this doesn't include the tires and it is unlikely you will find a 15 lb 20" rim, and when the weight of the tires works in it gets worse, but basically because the radius (r) works on the square, moment of inertia goes up rapidly.
Now the last formula to relate moment of inertia to torque can be basically represented by
T=I*alpha
where:
T= Torque
I= Moment of Inertia
alpha= angular acceleration (deceleration in our case)
without going into meaningless sample calcs, your brakes create a fixed torque and since the brakes are the same with only a wheel upgrade you can see an increase in moment of inertia translates into a decrease in the amount of angular acceleration which basically means more time to stop.
Time for a beer.
I=1/2mr^2
and is a function of the wheel mass (m) and the radius (r). Those with keen eyes might say that a wheel isn't a a true cylindrical disc, and you would be right, as there are mass variations, but for the purposes of showing the effect of wheel diameter and because the actual math is stupid crazy this is the simple version.
Let's assume you can find a 20" rim that weighs the same as a 15" steel wheel that the stock brakes were designed for so the mass (m) is the same. This means that the moment of inertia for
Factory approximation:
m= 15 lb
r=15"/2" or 0.625'
I= 2.93 lb-ft^2
Sweet looking 20's
m=15 lb
r= 20"/2" or 0.833''
I= 5.21 lb-ft^2
This means you increased the moment of inertia with the same weight wheel by 77% by simply changing diameter.
Now this doesn't include the tires and it is unlikely you will find a 15 lb 20" rim, and when the weight of the tires works in it gets worse, but basically because the radius (r) works on the square, moment of inertia goes up rapidly.
Now the last formula to relate moment of inertia to torque can be basically represented by
T=I*alpha
where:
T= Torque
I= Moment of Inertia
alpha= angular acceleration (deceleration in our case)
without going into meaningless sample calcs, your brakes create a fixed torque and since the brakes are the same with only a wheel upgrade you can see an increase in moment of inertia translates into a decrease in the amount of angular acceleration which basically means more time to stop.
Time for a beer.
Last edited:
turbodean87
Member
Yes. But
215/65/15 = 26" overall dia
305/30/20 = 26.5" overall dia
So not much difference?
Yay more maths! Anyways, I had to edit my above post for a miscalculation, but I will take a stab at the tires. Keep in mind this is an approximation as the tire sidewalls and tire tread have different mass distributions. This time the formula is
I= 1/2*m*(Major Radius^2 - Minor Radius^2)
Here is the math done in excel so I don't have to type it all out. Keep in mind in this example to show how the radius effects inertia I have kept the mass of the tires the same. Generally tires for 20" wheels tend to weigh more than tires for 15" wheels of similar diameter so just for kicks I tossed that into the calculations at the bottom. I don't have good information on how much a 20" wheel weighs, but this example was never meant to be anything other than an approximation to help with understanding the effect of radius.
Stuff from other post=
Just the tires, both at 21 lbs each:
Now with more probable tire weights courtesy of tirerack.com and my own tire weight for the 15"
Looks like roughly a 50% total increase when you look at realistic tires.
Hope this helps.
but to each there own.chris kirk
Active Member
Brandon706
Member
I have 20s installed on my Chevelle and compared to the 15 rallys I can honestly say I feel no difference in braking and accelerating. With the hydroboost, it will car send you through the windshield if hammer on the pedal and i haven't installed my Baer 14" brake kit. The nitro tires 305 30 20 actually hook great compared to the bf goodrich 15 tires believe it or not with 650hp Big block. A 20" rim is no way consider a "donk" styled rim in 2014, those guys are running 24" rims at a minimum. The older generation may feel different but I had some guys my age at car meet say my rims are kinda small. At the end of the day buy whatever make you think looks great,
getdowngranny
Mr. Fix It
Another pic for the haters.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Antbankstwo3
Active Member
I think you would be good with 20's. I'll stay smaller than that on my GN cuz I like the GNX style rim look. I do have 22's on my Skylark tho - w/no "mods" to suspension or brakes & it works/drives nice! I didn't upgrade it, but I replaced it all with newer parts. But I don't drive it everyday, just a weekend cruiser. I still keep the rally's tho cuz I like that look as well.
Do what makes you happy!
Do what makes you happy!
Antbankstwo3
Active Member
R u from Washington State? I'm from Olympia. Not living there anymore. But I visit cuz my mom & Stepdad is still there. Jus wanted to ask since I seen your Lic. Plates.
turbodean87
Member
40 miles north east of Seattle. Little town called Sultan.
Antbankstwo3
Active Member
I've heard of it. I'm in AZ now. Mom lives in Olympia!
Last edited:
turbodean87
Member
Don't get that far south very often. Where in az. Heard of kingman. My Parents retired there.
Antbankstwo3
Active Member
I have. Im in the Glendale area. Near University of Phoenix Stadium where the Cardinals play. NO! Im not a Cardinals fan!
GO SEAHAWKS!!!!
