By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Around here (south central Missouri) E85 is 45 cents a gallon less than 87 octane (E-85=$2.44/gal to 87 Octane=$2.89/gal) and a WHOLE bunch cheaper than 93 octane! Both E-85 and 93 are only available at one station each (not the same station either). I've been running 93 octane with 30% xylene which is pretty expensive too ($45 for a 5 gallon drum), in order to run 24-26psi of boost--and that's with alcohol injection too. I can run about 19-20psi on 93 octane with alcohol injection alone. I don't know why, but I can't get the boost numbers on alcohol injection alone that others get. If I put a big jet (.036) in, it floods the engine. Smaller jets up to .030 don't give me the knock suppression I want. Without alcohol injection my car will knock at 14psi, which it shouldn't, but always has (I've had it for 11 years and have lived in California, Texas, Colorado and Missouri in that time so I've used lots of different kinds of gas) so I'm always looking for ways to increase octane without running leaded gas all the time. I admit I'm addicted to high boost.... There's nothing like the rush of 24-26psi. I'd love to run 30, but can't get above 26 without red-lighting the knock detector ;-(
So, maybe E-85....
More boost is better.
Keith
Interesting. Is a flash arrestor that little spring-loaded, hinged lid that you have to push the gas nozzle past, there in the front of the filler neck?
I did notice that the E-85 competition you referenced in your link was in 1999. I currently have a 2002 Suburban flex-fuel vehicle that runs on E-85 all the time. It gets about 2-3 mpg less than with gas, but at $.45 a gallon difference (around here) it works out OK. Not a fuel mileage king with gas or E-85, if you know what I mean.
Unfortunately, according to the EPA, converting your car to straight ethanol equates to violating federal law... stiff penalties involved if you're caught. Their web site says no company has yet to get EPA certification to change a straight gas-burner into a straight ethanol or E85 burner...
Keith
and a failure due to 23 year old lines and hose filled with gasoline will be somehow better? in that situation, i think i'd rather have a slow, cold burning alky fire instead of a straight gasoline fire.Be sure to have a fire extinguisher handy....A failure caused by E85 will make you vulnerable for a fire when the leaks start.![]()
It's great that some of you guys are testing the E85 but just a fair warning...be careful on the tune because otherwise you'll be right behind me getting a new motor built by Dan at DLS! When running E85, you NEED to make sure you are adding enough fuel delivery. I would NOT try any of this on a stock computer!!! If you have a Translator Pro or even better, a FAST or BS3, have at it. A stock computer alone will not be able to add enough fuel. I'm going to be testing this stuff next spring once I get my car back together. I'll definitely have the upgraded fuel system for it. I'm gonna talk to Dan and see if he has any suggestions as far as the motor build goes when preparing to run this stuff.
I didn't realize you are suppose to run a hotter spark plug, were did you get info. on the spark plugs. Right now I'm using the t-pro (WB) and just finally did a little bit of tunning last night with the help of a fellow board member (Rick) so far I'm really impressed with the e85 I dont now why more people are not going this route. Just ask Rick87GN what he thought.