Seems to be several to choose from, and many tout "fast response", yet for the most part give no specifications. (Rather like the claim by most of the gauge manufacturers of a "very accurate" fuel pressure gauge, but with no accuracy specification or guaranty.) I figure the smaller the better, for quicker heat gain/loss and less obstruction, but what do I know. The one I saw quoting a response of 50ms is not intended for prolonged use, only testing due to the degradation of the 0.005" probe wire.
Next is where. I know many put 'em in the DP or by the O2 sensor for aggregate readings, but I'm considering putting bungs in each individual pipe to find out which are actually leanest and track those. I'm presuming #5 & #6, but why not verify? I'm even looking at a 6-EGT selector switch and considering leaving the probes in each pipe, more out of curiosity then necessity. Just kinda seems if there is a single probe in the DP or by the O2 that an aggregate temp of, say, 1550, could include perhaps 4 cylinders at 1475, 1 at 1600, and 1 at 1800. And the 1-3-5 bank will be cooled by some degree, who knows how much, during its travels through the crossover.
Am I over-thinking this?
Next is where. I know many put 'em in the DP or by the O2 sensor for aggregate readings, but I'm considering putting bungs in each individual pipe to find out which are actually leanest and track those. I'm presuming #5 & #6, but why not verify? I'm even looking at a 6-EGT selector switch and considering leaving the probes in each pipe, more out of curiosity then necessity. Just kinda seems if there is a single probe in the DP or by the O2 that an aggregate temp of, say, 1550, could include perhaps 4 cylinders at 1475, 1 at 1600, and 1 at 1800. And the 1-3-5 bank will be cooled by some degree, who knows how much, during its travels through the crossover.
Am I over-thinking this?
