pontiac69fb said:I don't know anything about blue book values, but I suspect that sticker prices on the cars would at least have a little to do with the blue book values. The sticker prices on grand nationals was probably higher then the stricker price of t-types, because a grand national is considered to be a step up from it and are usually more optioned out I believe.
Blaze said:snip - It depends on the options that you got - snip
Grumpy said:most people want a GN NOT a "T" ... I hate GN's becuase I have had a lot of them since 1986 ... I am tired of black carsI like the Ts and Limiteds because they are different colors and more of a sleeper
but bottom line GNs are worth more unless ya find someone like me that "has to have a certain T"
-------------------------------------Little6pack said:I finally Agree with Grump![]()
I shed my GN for a T. my Operating costs of the T are way better because they can be had cheaper these days. This allows you to put more goodies into them.
Plus I did not want to ruin my low mile GN adding speedo parts.
I think when the GN's go outta sight like the other super cars, then you will see the T's rise in price always being behind GN's by 40%
Economics 101 - supply and DEMAND85HOT-T said:Why is it that blue book value of a grand national is more than a T. Doesnt the fact that there was only 1/4 of the amount of t's made have an affect on this.
Just curious, if anyone has some interesting info, just let me know, Thanks
XLR8 said:Economics 101 - supply and DEMAND