87Turbo-TWE4
Member
- Joined
- May 9, 2008
- Messages
- 449
I currently run the Delco GNX o2 sensor in my car and wanted to know if there are any benefits to using a heated one.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!With a non-heated sensor and a stock exhaust, you won't see a problem with sensor cooling. However, if you have modified your exhaust to flow significantly better than the stock system, the sensor cooling will equate to poor gas mileage. Your MPG will suffer.
When the sensor cools below 900 deg F, the millivolt output falls off, which causes your ECM to add fuel as it "thinks" you are running lean. Your ECM causes a rich condition until the data from the sensor is corrected.
With a heated sensor, that won't happen. The extra heat generated in the sensor tip keeps the sensor above 900 deg F which is where the normal sensing function begins. The sensor has to be very hot to work properly.
Because the OEM's are required to maintain CAFE fuel levels, the heated sensors become standard issue, in fact, they have been doing it since around 1994.
This is understood like on a 1991 Camaro with a V6.
But..
How does this apply to the 1987 turbo charged 3.8 Buick motor with an O2 sensor sitting before a turbo under a lot of heat?
So your saying switching to a heated O2 sensor on a GN will improve gas mileage over a working single wire O2 sensor? If so by how much?
With the TT chip running open loop idle, I feel my heated O2 makes the car idle better. On the highway, I'm sure it's the same as before but the heated do take partially leaded gas better than non-heated, but I'm switching to no-lead 104 for my needs now.