Turbo-Archie
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
- Messages
- 1,529
I thought you were going to post pictures?
..
..
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!I don't think I would say that. There really is no replacement for displacement
I don't think I would say that. There really is no replacement for displacement
Come on out to the drag strip and prove it.
.........![]()
Then why do you run a stroker?
"Lou Czarnota Built 109 Block Stroker Motor"
..
Off topic question here:
Is there a MAJOR difference in performance between a 231ci and 247ci stroker LC2?
Strokers are thousands more than a 231ci setup, but is the performance from the extra 16ci (7% more ci than stock) that profound, beyond saying "I have a stroker"?
Maximum power potential is only the 7% more if that. The larger gain is with the stroker is more TQ and the ability to spool faster.
This could allow you to go with a bigger turbine wheel and potentially pick up top end hp.
OK.
Are there any dyno sheets comparing the 2 to show HOW MUCH more TQ or top end HP is produced at a certain RPM vs a 231ci motor?
Off topic question here:
Is there a MAJOR difference in performance between a 231ci and 247ci stroker LC2?
Strokers are thousands more than a 231ci setup, but is the performance from the extra 16ci (7% more ci than stock) that profound, beyond saying "I have a stroker"?
im waiting to see them as well. really, I am.I thought you were going to post pictures?
..