I've read numerous posts on the matter and the consensus seems to be that on TR's, a pinion snubber is bad for racing. Period.
My question is: Does it EVER help? Or, is it ALWAYS bad?
The reason that I'm asking, is that the best '60 that I have ever done, was a 1.66. Though this might have been due to a timer error, I have had '60's of 1.76, 1.75, 1.71, and 1.70 on my last two track outings. Nothing to write home about, but not too bad for a stock GN on a seldomly treated track.
My rear suspension is stock, except for airbags on both sides and a pinion snubber. Runs were made on 26 X 10 MT ET Drags mounted and screwed to 15 X 8 Centerline rims.
This past Saturday I had a best '60 of 1.71. I then removed the snubber, to see if it would help my '60. Well I did a 1.85, a 1.87 and the best I could do after that was a 1.77 (a new best ET/MPH though).
So, does the snubber help the '60, but hurt the overall ET by unloading the tires after the 60 ft mark? Or can my differences in '60's be attributable to an inconsistent launch technique?
Aloha, and TIA!
My question is: Does it EVER help? Or, is it ALWAYS bad?

The reason that I'm asking, is that the best '60 that I have ever done, was a 1.66. Though this might have been due to a timer error, I have had '60's of 1.76, 1.75, 1.71, and 1.70 on my last two track outings. Nothing to write home about, but not too bad for a stock GN on a seldomly treated track.

My rear suspension is stock, except for airbags on both sides and a pinion snubber. Runs were made on 26 X 10 MT ET Drags mounted and screwed to 15 X 8 Centerline rims.
This past Saturday I had a best '60 of 1.71. I then removed the snubber, to see if it would help my '60. Well I did a 1.85, a 1.87 and the best I could do after that was a 1.77 (a new best ET/MPH though).

So, does the snubber help the '60, but hurt the overall ET by unloading the tires after the 60 ft mark? Or can my differences in '60's be attributable to an inconsistent launch technique?

Aloha, and TIA!