By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Just keep in mind overall valve lift when choosing the rocker.
Been searching for awhile tonight and I can't get a conclusive answer for what the TTA stock rocker arm ratio is. I've found references to 1.55,1.60 and 1.70.
Anyone have a definitive answer or maybe we can get a consensus on them.
Hi WS6,
This is, as is commonly said, spliting hairs but, the actual ratio is 1.67. If you are going to change cams and rocker arms, I totaly agree with razor and you should go with a 1.6 not a 1.7. The lift is, of course, decided by the cam and to a certain degree, the rocker ratio. If you go to a larger lift cam you will need to change the length of the push rods. Now, this may sound more technical than it really is. The cam you get will have different info with it. Some times it will give the lift at the lobes, other times, when you order the cam, the vendor will ask you what your rocker ratio is. When the later is asked, your cam sheet or card will give you the over all lift, if the sheet gives lobe lift, just multiply the rocker ratio times the lift and that will give you over all. I again agree with razor that you have to be careful with lift. With the stock valve covers you are dealing with a limited space.
Is there any performance gain to install them now with my stock cam? My plan was to install them when I installed a roller cam but that may be a while. If there is even a small benefit I will put them in over the Winter.
Thanks,
Scott
Friction reduction is one benefit. Another benefit of roller rockers include true, blueprinted, at-the-valve ratios and precision motion. FYI, increasing the rocker ratio improves engine performance by opening the valves faster and further. The combined benefits of reduced friction and improved airflow can increase hp. Just guessing, I would guess 5 hp.
I believe I can use the stock push rods as well...correct? and also what about my 100# valve springs?
Scott