Ignore that thread, as it is so old, you can't even respond to it...
Originally posted by kh440
Is it just me or is a GN/vette comparison apples and oranges in the first place? I own and have owned GN's and owned a vette (86 or 87, I forget) The vette has god torque, handles well BUT: they ride like crap, are difficult to enter/exit and have all the leaks, squeaks and rattles you could ask for (mine sure did). Anyway, the Buick was never intended to go head to head with the vette; it was intended to be a brutal powerplant in a civilized easy to live with package.
Hence the desirability of the TTA . Handling of a Corvette with the acceleration of a GNx. What a combo!Originally posted by Scottie-GNZ
I certainly do not like the attitude, but since he is coming from a road-racing perspective, he is not innacurate in most of his statements. I know many with GN-colored glasses will flame me for saying that. On the othr hand, most "sports car" owners who get their asses handed to them on the strip usually whine about how much better their car handles and stops I think if both sides had a chance to live with the other car they would both appreciate each car's strong points.
Pretty much. You ever try to sit in the "back seat" of a 3rd Gen T/A?Originally posted by jsta6
two seater?
.....times 2. Yes indeed, I certainly know what you meanHandling of a Corvette with the acceleration of a GNx