Steve Hill
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2002
- Messages
- 114
oh boy, looks like we're stumped! Problem is, my limited plebeian knowledge on this is sure to get me into trouble.
But here goes anyway....
Note: Lots of question marks indicate I haven't got a clue
We all agree the boiling point, at least, is raised, yes?
It would then seems sensical the heat energy is likewise increased.
But, I THINK, because the temperature is higher is actually takes LESS specific heat for the phase change.
And if you allow my twisted logic a bit more freedom, I postulate, because of the temperature increase, the overall effect might be a net gain? ?? ???
Ohy, this is waaay over my bean brain.
In any case, we're talking a relatively small pressure increase so any deviation is likely academic.
Other opinions highly welcomed.
But here goes anyway....
Note: Lots of question marks indicate I haven't got a clue

We all agree the boiling point, at least, is raised, yes?
It would then seems sensical the heat energy is likewise increased.
But, I THINK, because the temperature is higher is actually takes LESS specific heat for the phase change.
And if you allow my twisted logic a bit more freedom, I postulate, because of the temperature increase, the overall effect might be a net gain? ?? ???
Ohy, this is waaay over my bean brain.
In any case, we're talking a relatively small pressure increase so any deviation is likely academic.
Other opinions highly welcomed.