tta 871

[idaho gn]

Details of the run:
60' 1.53
330'
1/8
MPH
1000'
1/4 11.62
MPH 112

Screen Name or Car Number Here idaho gn/#871
EMPTY WEIGHT:3565
BLOCK:109
HEADS:stock
CAM:206/206
TRANSMISSION:len (lasvegas) performance transmission 2004r
TORQUE CONVERTER:tcs 9x11 3500 stall
DIFFERENTIAL:stock
INTERCOOLER:dequick front mount
THROTTLE BODY:stock
RJC POWER PLATE:yes
INJECTORS:#55
THERMOSTAT:stock
TURBOCHARGER:turbonetics t-72 bb p trim external wg
VALVE SPRINGS: stock
MAF:z06 and trnslator
DOWN PIPE:custom made 3 inch dp by qualifab inc
EXHAUST: atr w/ crossflow muffler
FUEL PUMP:340
FUEL PRESSURE REGULATOR:red armstrong
FUEL PRESSURE:40 psi line off
ALCHOHOL INJECTION:hate it
PROPAIN INJECTION:never tried it
NITROUS:are you crazy?
AIR FILTER AND AIR INTAKE:4 inch inlet w/3-7/8 k&n
TIRE DESIGN, SIZE & AIR PRESSURE: hoosire qtp 26x11.5x15 on 10 inch wide convo pros
AIR BAG(s):nope
SUSPENSION:bone stock
SCAN TOOL:direct scan
FUEL:trick 110 leaded
CHIPte
CHIP TIMING:26 deg
KNOCK RETARD:none
OXYGEN SENSOR VOLTAGE:.787
EXHAUST GAS TEMPERATURE:na
TRACK ELEVATION:2800 ft air was at 6500 ft
TEMPERATURE: 98
PEAK BOOST:22
BOOST AT LAUNCH:22
MILES ON THE CAR/ENGINE:196345.3/56000

 

[Lee_Burough]

You could probably take some of those potatoes out before the next run

 

[Razor]

Can you make alcohol out of potatoes?

Hate it huh... It does taste pretty bad.

 

[idaho gn]

razor


rembember i talked to ya about you controller about a year ago?

i didnt like the smc kit cause it was to hard to keep in adjustment


you can make alcky out of potatoes

 

[RobR]

Nice times

But what happened to the mph?

 

[idaho gn]

whats wrong with the mph thats the norm for a mid 11 sec car

 

[RobR]

Originally posted by idaho gn
whats wrong with the mph thats the norm for a mid 11 sec car

maybe if it was a 1000# lighter. But the et and mph don't look right. Even when doing the online calculators it becomes really skewed.

As an aside, I ran 11.61@115.7 on a 1.62.

 

[idaho gn]

if you spin off the line and cut a 1.60 60 you will mph allot higher than if you dont spin i watched a 10.70 car run 118 in the quarter mile his 60 ft was 1.25 ive also seen a supra run 13 sec quarter at 140

 

[RobR]

That is true. But mine wasn't spinning when I did mine

Here's some numbers I ran, maybe not the greatest but something to look at. I picked 16% loss for both.

You Entered:
Vehicle Weight - 3565 (lbs)
Trap Speed - 112 (mph)
Drivetrain Loss - 16 (%)


Results:
Rear Wheel HP - 340.1
Crankshaft HP - 404.9
Power to Weight (rwhp) - 10.5 (lower is better)
Power to Weight (crank hp) - 8.8 (lower is better)

HP from ET:
Results:
449.1 Rear Wheel HP
534.6 Crankshaft HP

You Entered:
Vehicle Weight - 3565 (lbs)
Wheel HP - 340 (HP)


Results:
Trap Speed - 111.46 (mph @ end of 1/4 mi.)
E.T. - 12.74 (seconds @ end of 1/4 mi.)

You Entered:
Vehicle Weight - 3565 (lbs)
Wheel HP - 449 (HP)


Results:
Trap Speed - 122.28 (mph @ end of 1/4 mi.)
E.T. - 11.61 (seconds @ end of 1/4 mi.)

 

[1badTTA]

Hmmmmmmm
I would agree that the MPH is way low for the ET. Since I ran 12.9@111 with a 1.9xx 60' on a nearly stock car, I would say any TTA running 11.62 should be way faster than 112mph. Looking at the tranny and TC stall of 3500 I would guess it wasn't locked up and the 1.5 60' helped alot too.

 

[idaho gn]

the car put 405 to the rear wheels and 540 lbft of torque down on the dyno

 

[idaho gn]

and rembember im launchung at full boost of 22 lbs and at 4500 rpms so there is no delay on power its all there

 

[Razor]

You also didnt post 1/8 mile numbers. Or MPH at the 1/8. I bet like 97 in the 1/8 to pull the et and MPH listed. yet only picking up 15 on the top.

For a car to run 11.6 at 112.. you have to have lifted at the 1000ft mark. Or you have big issues at the top end.

I've run plenty of mid 11 second passes, your MPH would need to be 118-119 on a TTA to be average. 112.. I did that on a stock turbo with stock injectors 12.10 with a 1.6 60 foot.

I hate dyno's.. they lie.

 

[Razor]

Originally posted by idaho gn
razor


rembember i talked to ya about you controller about a year ago?

i didnt like the smc kit cause it was to hard to keep in adjustment


you can make alcky out of potatoes

Ahhh haa.. Comparing apples to radishes.. the grass is greener on the other side of the fence. Yes I remember when you called.. wondered what happened to ya.

No hard to keep adjustment issues here..

Wonder what potato alky taste like? Moonshine out of potatoes?

 

[1BADDAM]

Anybody check to see what elevation he is running at
There isn't enough air in the whole state for a 72

 

[idaho gn]

1/8th 7.402
mph 93.04



razor you would never run that time here on stock inj /turbo


you did see the air was at 6500 ft right ?




i have lots of runs to back this up so its what my car does


the suspension is working in my car and that is why the low to you mph

 

[Razor]

We typically pickup 20-25 on the big end. Some cars like Robs pick'd up 30. Hence why we said low numbers. But your altitude plays a major role.

See the 7.40 at 93 is not an issue. Just the 112 seemed low.. but altitude plays major havoc.

Sea level vs 6500 ft... I understand.

 

[idaho gn]

i also need bigger injectors to run bigger boost ......the injectors are static right now at 20-22 lbs of boost ...........72's are on the way

 

[idaho gn]

update............the car went to turbo thunder in woodburn OR. last weekend. with c-16 a slipping tranny 30 pounds of boost the car did a best et of 11.50 @100 mph(this was bracket racing so i was on the brakes hard).....on a time trial pass it went 123.93 60 ft times are 1.6X and it dosent matter if i launch at 15 or 30 lbs of boost . any ideas on how to get the 60 ft lower?

 

[idaho gn]

ttt



anyone