for got to mention, I run 27-30#'s w/ the alchy 23/21* on the street.
for got to mention, I run 27-30#'s w/ the alchy 23/21* on the street.
On a side note...
With all the fuss in the years past about the stock intake being so problematic about flowing equally to all cylinders I'd hope that EVERYONE that has alky also has a power plate. Even then, it's not guaranteed that the flow pattern of the alky spray is evenly distributed to all cylinders. It might be wise to relocate your knock sensor to the front of the engine so it can "hear" those two cylinders better. Something to think about.
I like the gas but have been thinking of alky for street action for no other reason than cost....
No flame here man but the plate controls air to the rear cylinders to richen them up, with that theory in mind...if the knock sensor was in the front you would decrease the likely hood of detecting knock of a rear cylinder lean condition.
Since when has 100ul become Race gas??
No flame taken but the design of the intake allows more air to enter the rear cylinders so they are the leanest so you are correct. However, if you are spraying a 7th injector (or in this case alky) I would assume that most of the alky will follow the air path and enter the rear cylinders and richen them up...which is good. So now you have alky enriched rear cylinders that doesn't detonate. BUT...what about the amount of alky that goes in the front cylinders at 25-28psi of boost? I would think that there would be more 93 fuel in the front cylinders due to the injectors being right there in the intake ports...therefore they would be the ones that would start detonating first on a alky equipped car. So that's the reasoning to move the knock sender to the front.
I run Alky & 91pump on the street. 24psi
I run C-16 at the track 28psi with a mist of Alky for cooling.
I can agree w/ that. Maybe some testing is in order for a channel/grooved plate to funnel the puddles of alky to the front cylinders.:biggrin:
the car needs a lot of other things like a cage so I can continue to run at the local tracks w/o getting yelled at:frown:
I was actually referring to the guys that don't have the power plate about what may be happening.
Yeah... that sucks!
That's what this thread was originally suppose to be about...which one is better to use in that situation.
Can someone explain which one is better without using the word "cost" or "cheaper" or "easy to find" or "easy to use" in their answer? Not a soul has explained which one is best to use for the best performance at any HP level. I think the original poster wanted to know that answer.
not trying to sound biased but next year when i acquire my gn i was actually leaning towards an alky kit :biggrin:...racing gas would be out of the question...college costs money meth is cheap and i also have access to a close hardware store friend and can get denatured for a little bit of nothing... i have "good" 93 octane readily availible down here in Georgia .... so how many degrees of knock are you getting?
I know your a pro at changing 02 sensors aint cha!
But I wont add that to the cost because I'm sure you get them replaced under warranty...at least I hope you do.
How much do you spend on fuel a month...answer=more than me:biggrin:
OK, I can see that there is no real evidence that alky is better than race gas in a Turbo Regal as far as a performance standpoint. The topic was "which is better" RACE GAS or ALKY....not "which one costs less to run".
I've taken my "alky bee suit" off and am finished poking the hive. Now, get back to your hives (alky section) and leave me alone...
OK, I can see that there is no real evidence that alky is better than race gas in a Turbo Regal as far as a performance standpoint. The topic was "which is better" RACE GAS or ALKY....not "which one costs less to run".
I've taken my "alky bee suit" off and am finished poking the hive. Now, get back to your hives (alky section) and leave me alone...