NY Twin Turbo
All the good stuff.....Times 2.
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
- Messages
- 2,877
I jumped into a thread in the "Performance ECM Upgrades" section with some questions. But there wasn't much feedback from you guys. So I'll give it a shot here in this section.
Why do we want to totally deactivate alky when in 2-step?
When we are not using the 2-step, we build boost normally on all 6 cylinders. So the actual AF is a reflection of the combined combustion of fuel and alky. Now, assuming the tune is good in the "boost building" areas of the VE map, there should be little to no correction to the fuel. Right?
Now, when we launch the car things are different. We activate the 2-step. Now spark will randomly be cut from the sequence. Raw fuel, alky, and uncombined oxygen spills into the exhaust stream messing up all the AF readings. This is why it is typical to not allow any O2 correction in the "building boost" areas of the VE map.
So why take alky out of the mix? If the XFI is using only it's VE number to fuel the motor, and this number normally represents the presumed presents of alky, and now that alky is gone, wouldn't the cylinders that do fire be going lean during 2-step?
If the VE number was right before, then it should still be very close. And if it was close with the alky involved, and then there is no Alky, then now it's lean. No?
I know we don't normally sit on the 2-step for hours at a time. So I understand a point made about a crisper power response after disengagement of the 2-step. But doesn't that raw fuel, alky and oxygen get thrown out into the headers and then expand and burn to help spool-up?
And if washing down the cylinders is concerned, then I guess this makes sense too. But is that all there is to it?
Or should we be using a "race only" tune that has higher VE numbers in the 2-step region of the map to compensate for the absence of alky?
Why do we want to totally deactivate alky when in 2-step?
When we are not using the 2-step, we build boost normally on all 6 cylinders. So the actual AF is a reflection of the combined combustion of fuel and alky. Now, assuming the tune is good in the "boost building" areas of the VE map, there should be little to no correction to the fuel. Right?
Now, when we launch the car things are different. We activate the 2-step. Now spark will randomly be cut from the sequence. Raw fuel, alky, and uncombined oxygen spills into the exhaust stream messing up all the AF readings. This is why it is typical to not allow any O2 correction in the "building boost" areas of the VE map.
So why take alky out of the mix? If the XFI is using only it's VE number to fuel the motor, and this number normally represents the presumed presents of alky, and now that alky is gone, wouldn't the cylinders that do fire be going lean during 2-step?
If the VE number was right before, then it should still be very close. And if it was close with the alky involved, and then there is no Alky, then now it's lean. No?
I know we don't normally sit on the 2-step for hours at a time. So I understand a point made about a crisper power response after disengagement of the 2-step. But doesn't that raw fuel, alky and oxygen get thrown out into the headers and then expand and burn to help spool-up?
And if washing down the cylinders is concerned, then I guess this makes sense too. But is that all there is to it?
Or should we be using a "race only" tune that has higher VE numbers in the 2-step region of the map to compensate for the absence of alky?