The following are some compressor information about a TA49 and TA33. I have made some assumptions regarding VE, IC efficiency, and operating conditions.
TO4E 60 Trim (TA49/TE44)
@ 5200 rpm, boost 17 psig, P/R= 2.16, HP=372, Air Flow=34.2#/min
@ 4200 rpm, boost 17 psig, P/R= 2.16, HP=310, Air Flow=28.6#/min
Surge Line @ 17 psig at 3400 rpm
Center of compressor Efficiency Island @ 14.5 psig (P/R=1.99) at 4700 rpm and Air Flow=29.6#/min.
TO4E 57 Trim (TA34 which I have)
@ 5200 rpm, boost 17 psig, P/R= 2.16, HP=368 Air Flow=34.0#/min
@ 4200 rpm, boost 17 psig, P/R= 2.16, HP=311, Air Flow=28.7#/min
Surge Line @ 17 psig at 2800 rpm
Center of compressor Efficiency Island @ 14.5 psig (P/R=1.99) at 4300 rpm and Air Flow=27.0#/min.
From the listed information you will note that the 57 trim compressor has better efficiency at lower rpm and most important the surge line is intersected at lower rpm.
If you operate in the range of 3000 to 5200 rpm and at a boost of 16 to 19 psig, I do not see any reason to use a 60 trim compressor (TA49/TE44). If however you are running race gas and higher boost levels the 60 trim would be a better choice.
Using a 57 trim compressor I ran 12.02s ET using a stock long block, but I was pushing the boost above 23 psig. Around town on 99 motor octane fuel this turbo was great even running 20 psig boost. When I run 93 pump fuel I back the boost down to 18 psig and back the timing down about 4 degrees.
I know that your hot air is different, but I still would look for the a turbo that is the most effecient in the range that I would be operating in.
Good Hunting
Donald McMullin