- Joined
- May 28, 2001
- Messages
- 16,703
In the "FWIW" dept....
Just completed some data logging on the LS in my 55.
Disappointing inlet air temps as high as 129*,were recorded, w/ the K&N under the hood. The tune is pulling almost all the timing when in power enrichment. AKA: WFO! 5* left out of 25*...[Truck tunes tend to be a lot more conservative than Vettes, F-bodies, in this area]
So, I decided to instrument the car for some real time logging of air temps.
Here's what I have w/ the thermocouples installed: 1,[labeled T1], at the cleaner element, 1, [labeled T2], in ft of the air inlet screen I've put in the core support panel.
Engine cold/off/hood closed/in shop. Ambient 84*F. Both sensors reading the same @84*.
Engine started and at 125* T1= 98*, T2 = 92*
Engine @ 165* T1 = 110* T2 = 103*
Moved car outside, ambient 91*, engine idling, 180*.
T1 = 116* T2 = 102*
Driving, engine temp @192*, ambient 94*. Humidity 43%.
T1 MPH T2
122* 30 95*
131* 40 95*
138* 50 94*
138* 60 94*
Since I was considering making a cowl inlet system, I logged some temps comparing the core support inlet temps with the fresh air inlet temps at the dr side duct.
Engine 191*, ambient 96*.
T1 is now the core support inlet temp, and T2 is the inside air duct temp.
T1 MPH T2
121 0 100
104 40 102
97 50 100
96 60 99
96 90 99
It appears that the cowl sheet metal has encountered enough heat soak, that the effort to use the cowl, will not provide an advantage over the core support inlet. [And, in most scenarios, be not as efficient]
Comments? Suggestions?
Next testing will be w/ a different shaped K&N, operating in a sealed plenum hooked to the core support opening. We'll see....
This info would apply to any air intake system. I just happened to have the LS in my 55...

Just completed some data logging on the LS in my 55.
Disappointing inlet air temps as high as 129*,were recorded, w/ the K&N under the hood. The tune is pulling almost all the timing when in power enrichment. AKA: WFO! 5* left out of 25*...[Truck tunes tend to be a lot more conservative than Vettes, F-bodies, in this area]
So, I decided to instrument the car for some real time logging of air temps.
Here's what I have w/ the thermocouples installed: 1,[labeled T1], at the cleaner element, 1, [labeled T2], in ft of the air inlet screen I've put in the core support panel.
Engine cold/off/hood closed/in shop. Ambient 84*F. Both sensors reading the same @84*.
Engine started and at 125* T1= 98*, T2 = 92*
Engine @ 165* T1 = 110* T2 = 103*
Moved car outside, ambient 91*, engine idling, 180*.
T1 = 116* T2 = 102*
Driving, engine temp @192*, ambient 94*. Humidity 43%.
T1 MPH T2
122* 30 95*
131* 40 95*
138* 50 94*
138* 60 94*
Since I was considering making a cowl inlet system, I logged some temps comparing the core support inlet temps with the fresh air inlet temps at the dr side duct.
Engine 191*, ambient 96*.
T1 is now the core support inlet temp, and T2 is the inside air duct temp.
T1 MPH T2
121 0 100
104 40 102
97 50 100
96 60 99
96 90 99
It appears that the cowl sheet metal has encountered enough heat soak, that the effort to use the cowl, will not provide an advantage over the core support inlet. [And, in most scenarios, be not as efficient]
Comments? Suggestions?
Next testing will be w/ a different shaped K&N, operating in a sealed plenum hooked to the core support opening. We'll see....
This info would apply to any air intake system. I just happened to have the LS in my 55...
