Originally posted by boostcreep
OK, so why can't you calculate the actual A/F ratio from the data? What's missing?
Nick
Nick - what is missing for the most part is the air flow rate! Unless you've got an extender chip, the air flow is pegged at 255 gm/sec. If you are really flowing 300 gm/sec, or 400 gm/sec, how would you know? Without the right air flow, figuring up the right a/f ratio isn't going to happen.
Another problem may be the non-linearity of the fuel injectors. In other words, does a 50 lb/hr injector at 50% duty cycle actually deliver 25 lb/hr? It might be 20 lb/hr, it might be 30 lb/hr, who knows? Well, I know some of the chip gurus out there know, but I don't.
There's other problems too, like the BLM. Here's an example to illustrate, with data from an old DS run of mine:
200 gm/s air flow as shown by DS, 40 lb/hr injectors, inj duty cycle shown by DS is 72.5%. BLM is pegged at 160. Commanded a/f ratio per DS is 11.1:1
40 lb/hr per injector x 6 injectors x 453.6 gm/lb / 3600 sec per hr = 30.24 gm of fuel per sec at 100% duty cycle. At the shown 72.5% duty cycle we get 30.24 * 0.725 = 21.924 gm/s fuel flow.
Match that to the 200 gm/s air:
200/21.924 = 9.1 a/f ratio.
It should match the commanded 11.1:1. Why doesn't it? Because the ecm is correcting the inj pw for the high BLM. 160/128 = 1.25, or 25%. The ecm is adding 25% more fuel because of that high BLM. You can take that into account in a number of ways... adjusting the MAF rate is one: 200 * 1.25 = 250 gm/sec, divided by 21.924 gm/s fuel = 11.4:1, pretty close to the commanded ratio.
So what a/f ratio did I actually have? Was it 9.1:1? Was it 11.1:1? Somewhere in between? I have no idea... And that is when the MAF isn't even pegged! Peg the MAF and the picture has become even more hazy.
John