F
Fred 86 GN
Guest
With a cone K&N stuck on the entrance or the MAF sensor being a big improvement over the stock air filter assembly, how much, if any, does a cold air induction (CAI) setup gain over the K&N on the MAF setup from your experience?
The CAI obviously should get cooler air, and should make more power because of that (approx. 1 hp per degree F), but...
I have heard that the added plumbing adds resistance to the intake tract in front of the turbo (makes sense), which is the worst place to have it. Something like 1% additional restiction equals 2% hp loss was a value thrown at me.
--AND--
The area in front of the drivers side front tire, where most CAI intakes or filters end up, is a low pressure area. If true, then the air is cooler, but at a low pressure, so the turbo can't suck it in as well. Maybe a "wash" in performance gain/loss?
I have gained 1.5mph by removing the highbeam light in front of the cone filter-on-MAF setup before. Let the colder air shoot right in on the filter once the car got moving.
Anyone have similar experience? Better?
There are a bunch of cars with the basic K&N cone on the MAF setup that run pretty fast. If the CAI was an improvement, why doesn't everyone use them?
On the other end of the spectrum is Racin Jason who told me his CAI setup gained him 3mph. His K&N cone is in front of the radiator, in the high pressure area behind the grill. That seems like a good idea to try.
Thanks for your input.
The CAI obviously should get cooler air, and should make more power because of that (approx. 1 hp per degree F), but...
I have heard that the added plumbing adds resistance to the intake tract in front of the turbo (makes sense), which is the worst place to have it. Something like 1% additional restiction equals 2% hp loss was a value thrown at me.
--AND--
The area in front of the drivers side front tire, where most CAI intakes or filters end up, is a low pressure area. If true, then the air is cooler, but at a low pressure, so the turbo can't suck it in as well. Maybe a "wash" in performance gain/loss?
I have gained 1.5mph by removing the highbeam light in front of the cone filter-on-MAF setup before. Let the colder air shoot right in on the filter once the car got moving.
Anyone have similar experience? Better?
There are a bunch of cars with the basic K&N cone on the MAF setup that run pretty fast. If the CAI was an improvement, why doesn't everyone use them?
On the other end of the spectrum is Racin Jason who told me his CAI setup gained him 3mph. His K&N cone is in front of the radiator, in the high pressure area behind the grill. That seems like a good idea to try.
Thanks for your input.