By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!does this help any?
I don't know the frequency of the rattle of the Vigilante, but knock sensors are tuned to a certain frequency that knock produces. I can only speculate that it shouldn't affect it.Could the computer hear this rattle in the multi-disc units and register it as knock?
ks
Let me 1st say IMHO, there is no better NL converter for our cars than a PTC. With that said, IMHO, there is no better lockup to be found capable of locking up at WOT for higher hp cars than a multi disk vigilante. They are extremely inefficient when not locked, however they may be the only choice for locking up a 700 RWHP car and being able to survive for any length of time....
You just have to live with the terrible racket they make in park or neutral....
My experience has shown the slip percentages (unlocked) at the end of the 1/4 for the vigilante converters are normally higher than 10%......and this slip percentage goes up a lot when you pour more power to them. I've seen plenty of PTC converters with 3-5% slip being fairly common.I went 7.24 @ 96 in the 1/8 at BG unlocked with my 5-disc Vig and my car is no hp monster, so it can't be too inefficient unlocked.
My experience has shown the slip percentages (unlocked) at the end of the 1/4 for the vigilante converters are normally higher than 10%......and this slip percentage goes up a lot when you pour more power to them. I've seen plenty of PTC converters with 3-5% slip being fairly common.
I have personally seen a car that ran 11.14 in the 1/4 pickup several MPH by locking the converter.
I've said all that to say.... I am running a 5-disk vigilante.... IMHO, it is the only choice for a bottom 10 or high 9 car that wants a lockup to lock at WOT. Most of the others will not recommend any WOT lockups.
The cat 's meow would be lockup durability of the vigilante with slip #'s like a 9-1/2" PTC NL converter.
So the complaint with that "pink" (Vigilante) Converter of mine was that - something was rattling in there and I noticed that the stall speed had changed making it substantially "looser" and to tell you the truth - I was NEVER happy with this converter from the day that 800 dollars left my checking account. It never stalled right - when I first got it, all I could "squeeze" out of the 0-Pump stall configuration was 2800 when I had the laptop connected and my foot on the brake and squeezing the shit out of that thing it would max at 2800. Not happy. Back on my back on my garage floor dropping the trans again, and had it changed to a 6-pump - which proved to be better - yet not very long lived.
The NL Converter I got from Lonnie years ago worked better than this thing - yet I wanted to make a change cause I had a history of pushing front pump bearings forward and cutting the front seal. I found a nice front pump bushing with a "shoulder" on it - yet this was after a couple of incidents - and it was at that time I went back to LU with this pink converter.
Remembering the old saying, "If you do what you always did - you will get what you always got". Hence I decided to not send this thing back to Precision, and per Bulletin Board Members and a good discussion with Dusty, I sent it off to him. He cut it open and examined it, and his assesment is as follows:
---------------------------------
It's been cut open. The liner was burnt indicating the clutch has been slipping. The major issue was the fins in the pump had broken loose which will make the converter very loose. It started out as a converter I would rate at 3400-3500 at 0-1 psi which is very loose. We need to replace the pump due to the broken fins so I can put a pump in it to make it closer to a 3000 stall. Do you feel it was to loose to begin with? The fins being broken can cause a rattle. They will also cause the stall to be higher than normal.