Hey everyone,
I have posted a few times on Chevytalk, but this forum seems packed with tons of great info. So here I am.
I have a Pontiac 468 with the FAST efi system. Recently got it running and I've been playing with the basics thus far.
The timing map is something I think I've done wrong. The default map in the ECU seemed to have a whole lot of initial timing at/off idle (34 if I remember right). I redid the table, trying to simulate a distributor with vacuum and mechanical advance. Basically the equivalent of 18 deg. initial, 38 total, with a 7 degree vacuum advance pod. Is this totally ridiculous? Am I still in the stone age?
I haven't been able to enter closed loop, either. Searched some posts and learned about the afterstart enrichment impeding closed loop, so I checked the table and saw it was ramping up enrichment from about 180 degrees on. I flattened it back to 0.4% but realized that the car probably hadn't been that hot tonight. And remembered a 15-20 degree discrepancy between my mechanical temp gauge and the electronic CTS parameter (CTS was reading 200+ all night). The CTS is in the intake, and the mechanical gauge is ported to the cylinder head. Is my CTS bad?
Thanks for the help!
I have posted a few times on Chevytalk, but this forum seems packed with tons of great info. So here I am.
I have a Pontiac 468 with the FAST efi system. Recently got it running and I've been playing with the basics thus far.
The timing map is something I think I've done wrong. The default map in the ECU seemed to have a whole lot of initial timing at/off idle (34 if I remember right). I redid the table, trying to simulate a distributor with vacuum and mechanical advance. Basically the equivalent of 18 deg. initial, 38 total, with a 7 degree vacuum advance pod. Is this totally ridiculous? Am I still in the stone age?
I haven't been able to enter closed loop, either. Searched some posts and learned about the afterstart enrichment impeding closed loop, so I checked the table and saw it was ramping up enrichment from about 180 degrees on. I flattened it back to 0.4% but realized that the car probably hadn't been that hot tonight. And remembered a 15-20 degree discrepancy between my mechanical temp gauge and the electronic CTS parameter (CTS was reading 200+ all night). The CTS is in the intake, and the mechanical gauge is ported to the cylinder head. Is my CTS bad?
Thanks for the help!