racemybuick
Hot Air Teacher/Student
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2003
- Messages
- 1,174


John
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Ok you got me, I didn't read the link. But you know as well as I do that Leo ran a hybrid turbo equivalent to a "I think a 63 series" in an 87 housing on that car with a 3000 plus vigilante multi-disc lock-up. And that is a hell of a difference than running a big duration cam, TA33 and 2800 stall converter. I'm not disputing you, I subscribe to the same theory that a cam is too big when it can't fit in the block. But what good is a huge cam without the supporting mods to go with it? The only goal you will accomplish is leaving useful horsepower on the table because your engine can't make sufficient power up to the powerband that the cam is designed for. And you WFO should know that I'm right. I have not said one time that the cam he chose was too big, all I have said all along is that he needed the supporting mods to go with it. So why all the chatter? As a kid before I was into racing I remeber seeing highschool buddies with small block chevy V8's with the lumpity, lump cam and that thing sounded killer but was a dog out the hole and would barely spin the tires.......I'd say he was mismatched. After learning more about cams and the affect they have on the power band I choose to go with the theory that bigger is not always better if that's all you got is a cam.
EatM up.......everything you listed in your combo is fine even the cam but that's pending on your turbo and converter choice......maybe tech specialist WFO can help you out with that.:biggrin:![]()
Ok you got me, I didn't read the link. But you know as well as I do that Leo ran a hybrid turbo equivalent to a "I think a 63 series" in an 87 housing on that car with a 3000 plus vigilante multi-disc lock-up. And that is a hell of a difference than running a big duration cam, TA33 and 2800 stall converter. I'm not disputing you, I subscribe to the same theory that a cam is too big when it can't fit in the block. But what good is a huge cam without the supporting mods to go with it? The only goal you will accomplish is leaving useful horsepower on the table because your engine can't make sufficient power up to the powerband that the cam is designed for. And you WFO should know that I'm right. I have not said one time that the cam he chose was too big, all I have said all along is that he needed the supporting mods to go with it. So why all the chatter? As a kid before I was into racing I remeber seeing highschool buddies with small block chevy V8's with the lumpity, lump cam and that thing sounded killer but was a dog out the hole and would barely spin the tires.......I'd say he was mismatched. After learning more about cams and the affect they have on the power band I choose to go with the theory that bigger is not always better if that's all you got is a cam.
EatM up.......everything you listed in your combo is fine even the cam but that's pending on your turbo and converter choice......maybe tech specialist WFO can help you out with that.:biggrin:![]()
That's not that big of a cam,who told you you need roller rockers?
I know Lee always runs "big" cams maybe he'll chime in.
The numbers look big for a turbo cam,but a 224 cam is run of the mill performance grind.Just make sure your valvesprings are good for the lift.
I kind of disagree with you on this one to a point. It's not that big of a cam unless you have a really big turbo and proper stall speed to support it. A cam that size will move the power band wayyyy up the RPM chain and if you don't have the other supporting factors your car's gonna be a dog until it hits about 4000 rpm. And by then if you have a small turbo it will be on it's way out. That's why it's the combo that makes the difference not just big, big, big on everything.
Well he says he has a built shortblock and a 600hp goal so I doubt he plans to run the stock turbo and a D5..
There are plenty of other factors that play into cam design that will determine how it will run and idle. It wasn't that long ago that everyone was regurgitating the "stock cam is good for 10s blah blah" line.This may be "true",but if you hang the valves open farther and longer you'll make more power all else being equal.Saying you won't is ignorant.
It'll all come down to if the cam retains driveability at the desired power level.
Easy there butthurt....
Funny thing is that I have a 208 cam in my car...Geno sold it to me cheap after he went 9s with it.So smaller cams obviously work.
But if I had to buy one new instead of going the cheapass hotair guy route I would have gone with the same cam Lee was runing.
I'm also entertained by you "arguing" the same points (convertor/turbo) that I made 5 posts ago.
So I'll say it again...DECIDE RIGHT NOW how fast you want to go and what kind of street manners you are willing to live with. If you're OK with a little more idle thump and some convertor stall then keep the 224 and get a new 61/62 turbo and call Dusty Bradford for a PTC convertor to match.
If you want the stock idle and are happy going slower get a TA49 and a 206 cam and keep your D5.
This sh!t's all been done girls,no reason to get your tampon string in a knot..
You also need to know NOW what turbo and convertor you're going to run and what your actual goals are.Otherwise you should just go small and hope for the best.
We all embrace "Going Fast with class" and this means leaving ego's at the front door.
This applies to all of us.
so this billet 6262 is looking kinda of nice whats this 3 bolt 4 bolt stuff for the turbos?
and another thing should i get billet main caps or just get a girdle? thanks guys!!
......... or should i just sell it all and go for a 86/86 setup?
thanks josh