You can type here any text you want

Lessons learned on engine built

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

typhoon

Member
Joined
May 24, 2001
Messages
254
Learned a few things while assembling. Thought I may post so future people may run across during search.

Hotair motors have

Different cam bearings
Oil Pan gasket (is obvious and I knew this one already)
Head bolts Uses ARP 123-3601 NOT 123-3603

You would think being is same head, the bolts would be the same. In my searches here, gathering part #'s I didn't see any threads mentioning it until AFTER I had the new bolts. O well.
 
i believe the holes in the block are different depth- shallower.i also found out something reguarding a olds 3.8 86 block and a buick block. the head bolts on the olds are larger and longer for the same 8445 heads. i believe the buick bolts are 9/16 and shorter-the olds were 5/8 and longer. when trying to put on a set of buick 8445 heads on the olds block with buick bolts-they would not even catch the threads.weird that a normally aspired olds 3.8 had heavier duty head bolts than the buick from the factory.the olds bolts were at least 1" longer.-go figure?
 
I got new ARP bolts, and they worked great. Heads are now on.

I would say lenght was upwards of 1" different.
 
STICKY IT!!

Souldn't there be a STICKY on this subject? Would be very informative to peps:cool:

Nick
 
Originally posted by 49-blues
i believe the holes in the block are different depth- shallower.i also found out something reguarding a olds 3.8 86 block and a buick block. the head bolts on the olds are larger and longer for the same 8445 heads. i believe the buick bolts are 9/16 and shorter-the olds were 5/8 and longer. when trying to put on a set of buick 8445 heads on the olds block with buick bolts-they would not even catch the threads.weird that a normally aspired olds 3.8 had heavier duty head bolts than the buick from the factory.the olds bolts were at least 1" longer.-go figure?

I could be wrong but don't think Olds ever made a 3.8L motor. The 86-87 Buick 3.8s had deeper threads that started farther down in the block than the 84-85 Buicks. Don't know if they're stronger but it reduces the chance of cracking the deck and lessens warpage.
 
In a 86/87 N/A olds cutlas ,the G bodies had alot of 3.8 s- whether they are olds or buick- dont know ,probably buick- All i know is from the factory the olds headbolts are heavier duty on a NA 2 barrell engine than on the buick 3.8 turbo motor- find an engine, pull out a headbolt and measure against a 3.8 turbo block and you should be quite surprised. my 86 cutlas also had all the body bushings-even the #5 gnx bushings that neither of my 3 turbo cars had.Bottom line is the olds headbolts put in from the factory were wider 5/8" vs 9/16" and about 1" longer , so if anybody was to build a NA block in a turbo application they might be better off getting one out of a 86/87 olds cutlass just for the better clamping force.HTRH- just remembered the buick block i was comparing the 86 olds block to was an 84 buickblock.- that would explain it- just get an 86/87 6109 block.
 
As far as I know Olds DID make a 3.8L I should know I have one in my 87 Cutty. My uncle informed me that Olds and Buick both made the 3.8L carbed engines for G-Bodies in those years. I don't remember the difference but the Olds were more reliable and the "better" of the 2 for whatever reason.

I'd also like to mention that my olds is the SLOWEST car i've ever driven in....:(
 
I don't know, wish someone could verify this but in all the years I've been going through the junkyards, the only 3.8L in a G-body I've ever seen has been the Buick motor. Whether it's a Cutlass, Gran Prix, or Monte Carlo it still uses the Buick V6 if it has a V6.
 
Back
Top