GNBRETT
Pelennor Fields
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Messages
- 15,860
The new X3. TASER X3 Demonstration
New TASER released.
- Thread starter GNBRETT
- Start date
Welcome!
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
WeAreVenom
Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2005
- Messages
- 821
Awesome! Can't wait for the "3 People Tazed to Death at Same Time" on the news!:biggrin:
DailyDrifter
The Slow and the Curious
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2007
- Messages
- 5,118
Why did they use 3 girls for the experiment?
GNBRETT
Pelennor Fields
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Messages
- 15,860
You mean like dog trainers use when training animals? I agree.
Pronto
No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot.
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
- Messages
- 16,805
Welfare moms needed the money.
What they are not telling is they are wearing Depends so when they wet themselves it won't show.:wink:
WeAreVenom
Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2005
- Messages
- 821
Those women didn't even cry out. Maybe they lowered the voltage?
I read the description of the new unit. It sounds like its able to adjust the current to maintain better control. Makes sence if all 3 shots were designed to run at the same time.
The old unit was more of a resistance based machine. More resistance more current. No one ever gets the full voltage. So when you see those descriptions about subjects getting 50,000 volts in the news or media, its often incorrect.
Example, If the unit can maintain the programmed pulse cycle only using 5 volts then thats all you get. Of course to be effective there is a minimum voltage threshold needed to be effective.
The old unit was more of a resistance based machine. More resistance more current. No one ever gets the full voltage. So when you see those descriptions about subjects getting 50,000 volts in the news or media, its often incorrect.
Example, If the unit can maintain the programmed pulse cycle only using 5 volts then thats all you get. Of course to be effective there is a minimum voltage threshold needed to be effective.
Disclaimer:
Before all the electrical engineers or laminar flow folks(jk!
) step in. Ther above description is loosely writen. Perhaps some of the terms are incorrectly used, but writen in a way that normal folks can understand.Aren't you a cop? Makes sense.
GNBRETT
Pelennor Fields
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- Messages
- 15,860
Considering the Draconian state you live in Billy as far as gun control punishment goes it really suprises me they would not allow the Police to have such a great tool. I can understand making it specifically unlawful for a civilan to carry but it makes absolutely no sense to prohibit the Police from having them.
Who made that decision anyway to prohibit law enforcement from carrying them?
Without a shaddow of a doubt it is the best tool ever developed for law enforcement. The firearm is great and needed of course but considering only 1/2 of 1% of the Police officers in this country ever even discharge their weapon at someone I would think NJ would be craving for more effective less lethal devices.
I personally know of two incidents in my own dept. where lives would have been saved (Not that it's a loss to society
) if the Taser was available.Why haven't your unions taken the state to court? I'm sure Taser International would send reps on the your behalf.
WeAreVenom
Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2005
- Messages
- 821
I have carried the M26 model for about 6 years now. I have fired it only once. Every other time, just removing it from the holster and turning the unit on will gain compliance.
Should be noted that we have watched videos of inmates at the jail training on how to fail on the ground after taser utilization in order to break the wires and escape. The new unit will be very helpful as there will be no "down time" reloading.
