I personally now like the idea of spooling a turbo quickly through the turbine side rather than the compressor side. All of this is just to get the brain gears turning. Modifying the compressor side does not effect backpressure of the exhaust side, but whatever goes through the compressor has to go into the intake. Therefore, my original question was if you dump excess propane or alky into the intake at low boost, how badly will this effect combustion efficiency? I'm not throwing out the nos method, I just want that as MY last resort. Now, modifying the turbine side creates more backpressure then typically expected and depending on how well its controlled this can really make for a fast turbo. As long as the backpressure doesn't skyrocket resulting in ineffiency of the combustion chamber exhaust flow or a compound pressure that blows the head gasket, this method has a lot of potential as long as its controlled properly.
The key to all this is if you can make a high volume/boost turbo streetable, you have probably the baddest ride out there.
One last comment on propane, 200 psi does not have near the potential of nos 2000 psi, but if (and I'm just saying if) propane was setup in a 2000 psi bottle (danger multiplies too!) there is a lot of turbo spooling potential in that bottle!
The key to all this is if you can make a high volume/boost turbo streetable, you have probably the baddest ride out there.
One last comment on propane, 200 psi does not have near the potential of nos 2000 psi, but if (and I'm just saying if) propane was setup in a 2000 psi bottle (danger multiplies too!) there is a lot of turbo spooling potential in that bottle!
