You can type here any text you want

Read this at Barnes and Noble..

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

tommyguns

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
301
I was reading a book on 1973-2006 "Muscle cars".

They had the 87 GN doing 4.9 0-60, and like 13.43.

I got to looking around other cars like a 2003 Cobra, 4.8 0-60 and 13.50.

Is this correct? Can an 87 GN do this? Stock for stock, Id think the Cobra would win..GNX was 4.7 secs.
 
stock for stock, on paper & real world the 03-04 supercharged cobras are faster than our beloved turbo bricks...but with a few tweaks... ;)
 
I think Car & Driver got a 0 - 60 time of 4.9 and 1/4 mile in 13.9 back when they tested the 86 GN. :) Granted it was like 4* degrees out when they tested it. :eek:

Someone on here must have the article scanned.



Matt
 
When I bought my GN it was 100% stock, down to the cat and air filter. Ran a string of 14ohs and a 14.2. Could have ran a high 13 I think if I could have gottin better traction. So it's NOT impossible. Most i've seen going back to when these cars were new ran 14.1-14.3's. Course a LOT depends on the driver too and air temp!!....;)

Ken B.
 
16 years of newer technology and were still comparable, Turbo Buicks are OK in my book. Mine went 14.0 bone stock on first pass:cool:
 
that 13.4 is probably misquoted from a GNX road test. And the 13.5 cobra is a dog. Hell the NA cobras are almost that fast. I have a friend that I watched run a 12.4# at 113 in a bone stock cobra( most are 12.8 at 110 cars). So on the street even with a bad launch a stock GN isn't much contest for a 03 and up cobra. Now a GT... that race is pretty close
 
Averages for the 1987 Turbo Buicks were between 13.7 and 14.3, remember there are alot of varibles, ie: driver, weather, track,etc. Same for the Cobras they vary. Both with minimal tweaks are fast cars. But as I said before the buicks were from the 80's technology.
 
Back
Top