Sequential Turbo Setup

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
I think there was a thread last year about this. I'm sure you could build one, but why would you?
 
Most supra guys around here switch to single turbo set ups unless they're doing a lot auto cross and I've seen a few of them do a legit twin set up
 
yea i dont think the compound turbo thing would work for a buick... what advantage would there be? modern turbo/converter technology has covered those areas pretty well.
 
It's very common when trying to achieve a very high pressure ratio without overheating the charge air. Most commonly used on diesels for tractor pulling. They run very high pressure ratios and have the turbos staged with coolers in between. There is about zero advantage with one on a street car especially with the purpose built turbos these days.
 
I can't think of any situation where someone went from a single to a sequential to improve performance. All the instances I've heard of have been the opposite.

If I were going to have to power adders in series I'd build a small turbo blowing into a blower. The belt driven compressor would have zero lag and a small turbo blowing into it would make the blower more efficient.....

.....and if I wanted more efficiency than than, I'd toss the blower and go with a big single turbo :D
 
IMHO, I would prefer two turbos (if the budget allowed on my GN's), but NOT sequential. But rather one for each bank.
The one thing I've learned playing with my FoMoCo EcoBoost power plant in my Lincoln is that two smaller turbos have one huge advantage, and that is, lightning fast spoolup. This motor literally has zero perceptable turbo lag. None. Nada. Zero. Which of course makes throttle stomping a ton of fun!! Are they small? sure, (48mm) but each one only has to feed the equivalant of 3 cylinders.
 
IMHO, I would prefer two turbos (if the budget allowed on my GN's), but NOT sequential. But rather one for each bank.
The one thing I've learned playing with my FoMoCo EcoBoost power plant in my Lincoln is that two smaller turbos have one huge advantage, and that is, lightning fast spoolup. This motor literally has zero perceptable turbo lag. None. Nada. Zero. Which of course makes throttle stomping a ton of fun!! Are they small? sure, (48mm) but each one only has to feed the equivalant of 3 cylinders.

Ditto! I'd love a pair of twins on mine..

ks
 
IMHO, I would prefer two turbos (if the budget allowed on my GN's), but NOT sequential. But rather one for each bank.
The one thing I've learned playing with my FoMoCo EcoBoost power plant in my Lincoln is that two smaller turbos have one huge advantage, and that is, lightning fast spoolup. This motor literally has zero perceptable turbo lag. None. Nada. Zero. Which of course makes throttle stomping a ton of fun!! Are they small? sure, (48mm) but each one only has to feed the equivalant of 3 cylinders.

My BB6265 with a .63 spools insane fast. The boost comes on now. N0 delay.
 
I think people are confused on twins, compounds and sequential... ive wanted to do a vgt setup on mine but seems like alot of work for little gain
 
Lots of those eco boom cars and trucks around here. The trucks are already well known to have they're issues and are in the local shops often for oiling problems. The shop i go to hates them, an under hood night mare to work on.

Thanks Joe
 
^^^yep the new turbo systems are so complex... Diesels have always kept them pretty simple and bullet proof (until the emissions crap). If you love boost diesels are the best 70 psi on my old truck. No AFR just shove as much air into the motor as possible.
 
Back
Top