You can type here any text you want

Sounds from the other side ...................... Video

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
Am I correct to think that the Stangs are low in the torque dept compared to their HP #'s.Our cars have more torque and less HP it would seem.The truck has the better torque due to the larger displacement I would also presume.Is the torque not the most important factor in acceleration? Steve Wood?
 
Are those cars stock? If they are Ford really under rated their HP on what they advertised.:eek:
 
Originally posted by TurboBuickSix
Am I correct to think that the Stangs are low in the torque dept compared to their HP #'s.Our cars have more torque and less HP it would seem.The truck has the better torque due to the larger displacement I would also presume.Is the torque not the most important factor in acceleration? Steve Wood?


Horsepower is a calculated measurement and is basically (torque X RPM's)/5252.

So if HP =TQ X RPM/5252 and RPM's are 5252, then HP = TQ (1/1) or HP = Torque at that RPM.

Notice also that high RPM and low torque can equal the same HP as something with High Torque and Low RPM.

Buicks make their peak HP below 5000 RPMs so their Peak TQ is WAY HIGHER than a similar HP car that makes its peak HP above 5000 RPM (like a 6500 RPM cobra)

Average HP is most important in acceleration. Cars with high peak HP may accellerate slower that those with a lower peak, because the average HP is greater. Turbo buicks have High average HP in the 1/4 mile.
 
Back
Top