Clearly we have a different view of government and its many appendages. For the record I tend to take the contrarian view on almost everything from the government, only because their programs are always of a social engineering construct (see tax code, farm programs, social services programs for numerous other examples). But I digress.
I appreciate your background and respect your opinion. But you never addressed my points on Fluoride. I don't disagree there is some link between fluoride and lower rates of tooth decay. But that was never my point. My position is that it may help, but it damages so many other parts of your body why risk it?
So do you disagree that the compound Sodium Fluoride is used in public drinking water supplies? I have confirmed with the water department of the largest metropolitan area in SD that it is in fact used. It is used nationwide. See attached Material Safety Data Sheet for reference.
http://www.sciencelab.com/msds.php?msdsId=9927595
Furthermore do you disagree that Sodium Flouride has serious negative health consequences? See attached links for an overview.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/01/02/fluoride-controversy.aspx
I have one cavity and was raised on well water. Go figure. I think genetics, diet, and oral health have a much bigger influence on cavity rates than they are given credit for. See attached link.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...1/22/does-fluoride-really-fight-cavities.aspx
I've hijacked this thread enough. We'll just have to agree to disagree.