Originally posted by bobc455
Wait a minute.
You are saying that the fuel savings in 3 months can pay for a new sensor?
So, I can save $349 in fuel by having the wideband installed, in three months of driving? That's funny, because I get the exact same fuel mileage whether or not my O2 is installed. How much do you pay for fuel and how many miles do you drive?
Please post the records of your mileage traveled and gas consumed, I think you are miscalculating the fuel savings.
Norbs, I also get -25% correction on decel, but I suspect an inaccurate reading under those conditions (since that doesn't change when I drastically reduce my VE numbers in that area). And 25% correction of a 2% duty cycle isn't gonna mean squat. Besides if you are getting the fuel savings from your decel condition alone, then you must drive down a lot of steep mountains.
For any other conditions, if you have less than 3% correction, then your VE table is close enough that you can remove the sensor.
I will concede that if someone is driving around with horribly inaccurate VE tables and they are relying on the O2 for the tuning, then the O2 will help you. But even then, I don't believe $349 savings in 2-3 months. (And besides, the person whose tables are that inaccurate should trade their controller back in for a stock unit as they don't understand how to use what they have).
I will also concede that humidity and temperature can have very mild affects on engine operation, but no way will that ever make up $125 / month iin fuel savings.
-Bob Cunningham