By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!I think you can find it here Dave.So what size?
TT/Ameasap said:I think you can find it here Dave.
http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/threads/modifying-stock-fuel-lines.382334/page-2
jpwalt1987 said:I had a car that a 255 lph pump was over powering the return a little bit. It would drop from 43 to 40 when the vacuum line was put on. I drilled the Saginaw fitting under the regulator to a little bigger than 5/32nds. That helped some. The biggest difference was at the frame rail. It looked like the Saginaw fitting was crimped down alot more than usual. Especially on the end. Drilled it to the same diameter and it now drops from 43 to 36-38.
Posted from the TurboBuick.Com mobile app
E85 uses 30% more fuel throughout the entire rpm range,including idle. Because of this,high fuel pressure at idle is less likely to happen. I am making 750 hp on E85 with stock supply and return lines. This volume of fuel is equivalent to the amount of fuel that a 975 hp gasoline motor would use.Reality is for a E85 fuel system to support horsepower for 11 second or better will need a bigger return line.
E85 uses 30% more fuel throughout the entire rpm range,including idle. Because of this,high fuel pressure at idle is less likely to happen. I am making 750 hp on E85 with stock supply and return lines. This volume of fuel is equivalent to the amount of fuel that a 975 hp gasoline motor would use.
Motor. Yes.To the wheels? Same setup as your sig? Mainly I am curious about the 120's.
A lot of them seem to be different than others. Not taken into consideration if someone monkeyed with there 25+ year old car and tweaked them and didn't know it.Why is there so much debate about stock lines? Shouldn't this be cut N dry? Or are some of these people have pinched lines and don't know it? I just don't get it?