The largest fitting is a -12 from the pump and I use a 180 deg. fitting at the pump with a small, cleanable mesh in-line filter since this is the oil supply from the pan.
The next fitting is a -10 pump out which is going to the remote oil filter.
The smallest fitting is the by-pass which returns to the pan.
The remote does not have a by-pass so all oil supplied to the engine and turbo is 100% filtered.
I sure I posted this recently but here it is again. Because of all the clutter, you may want to wait until the engine is in before ordering stuff. I have a mix of 120,180, and 90 degree fittings.
AG.
question too.. are you both using stock front covers with HV gears? or HV cover with 455 HV gears? Currently I have a stock cover with HV gears.. considering going to a new front cover ,but not sure if I should go bigger.
Mine is an HV cover with the flat style (non pocket) TA adapter. I once had the Dutweiler HV adapter with the pocket and wasn't happy with trying to align it without the gears hitting the sides.
AG
That is a lot going on.. looks like turbo oil return to the driver's side pan, and oil pump bypass to the fuel pump block off? the line attached to the frame rail, that's the fuel feed?
That is a lot going on.. looks like turbo oil return to the driver's side pan, and oil pump bypass to the fuel pump block off? the line attached to the frame rail, that's the fuel feed?
Yes on all. I have changed it further since this picture. I had dual feed the fuel rails so there is a fuel log on the radiator support feeding both sides if the rail and a -10 return to tank. In this picture, that's a -8 off the regulator on the drivers side. The turbo has change a lot and the water pump removed for clearance reasons and a remote pump mounted by the frame.
AG.
BW full size compressor housing takes up a lot if room. Lost nothing in spool time with this journal bearing turbo vs the single BB T-netics. And this is apples to apples comparison due to turbines and A/R being similar.