By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!For the time that was really hauling the mail. With today's converter tech and blowing on it really hard with a fresh stock cam and 1.75 intake rocker ratio on a 9:1 engine 133-134mph would be relatively easy. Maybe i shouldnt throw the easy word around. Tall slick and 3.23's. Need a lot of octane though.Not sure what the fastest stock turbo went, but as far as camshafts though, the stock LC2 cam specs (I believe) are; 192/196 .384"/.408" (w/1.55 rockers) @ 107 LSA. If Cotton trapped that fast with the stock cam, that is very impressive...
For the time that was really hauling the mail. With today's converter tech and blowing on it really hard with a fresh stock cam and 1.75 intake rocker ratio on a 9:1 engine 133-134mph would be relatively easy. Maybe i shouldnt throw the easy word around. Tall slick and 3.23's. Need a lot of octane though.
A LU converter is only going to be good while locked. The PTC NLU will be pulling from the start to the end of the 1/4mile. Most are locking in 3rd, which is usually at the 1/8 mile mark, losing the first half of the track. The stock cam will need low rpms and cylinder pressure.Brian got a question.. why do you mention the 323's for that recipe Im assuming you would want the 323's because your a fan of NLU and 28" tires im assuming to keep RPM's lower. How about if a LU converter is utilized would you still run the smaller gears opposed to the 3;42's.. Brian i know you are a big fan of the PTC NLU's but a few years ago ..well let me re-phrase that..From what i have read you used to run LU and lock it on 3rd or on a certain MPH i cant recall the thread i read it on but its somehwere obviously an old thread..I also like the explanation of why a PTC NLU is superior because it couples like no other you have tested. But for a street driven car and commuting on the highway with an occasional stop at the track i think a LU is beneficial. So would the 323s be used because of the NLU or do you just prefer the smaller gear ratio.
x2! LOL . . . . that is when Bison makes a piston take a sheaaat . . . . .. . . . and today i learned a new term .. pulling a bison . . .
Why is it that you always make is sound and look easy? LOL......... I never pursued the stock cam myself but with a set of GN1 heads and a custom set of rocker arms i wouldnt be too impressed with less than 133mph with boost under 30psi.
87chrisss said:Brian got a question.. why do you mention the 323's for that recipe Im assuming you would want the 323's because your a fan of NLU and 28" tires im assuming to keep RPM's lower. How about if a LU converter is utilized would you still run the smaller gears opposed to the 3;42's.. Brian i know you are a big fan of the PTC NLU's but a few years ago ..well let me re-phrase that..From what i have read you used to run LU and lock it on 3rd or on a certain MPH i cant recall the thread i read it on but its somehwere obviously an old thread..I also like the explanation of why a PTC NLU is superior because it couples like no other you have tested. But for a street driven car and commuting on the highway with an occasional stop at the track i think a LU is beneficial. So would the 323s be used because of the NLU or do you just prefer the smaller gear ratio.
Jerryl said:x2! LOL . . . . that is when Bison makes a piston take a sheaaat . . . . .
Why is it that you always make is sound and look easy? LOL
Jim Hicks went 10.40's on a stock longblock.
TE45A, tons of boost, cojones of steel.
Bob