GN's are a waste of money, no power.

Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
This just proves that the world has an unlimited supply of idiots.
 
That idiots comments all made since when he admitted he owned a Monte SS. He's just really frustrated after getting beat for the last 20 years or so...............................;)

Ken B.
 
i chose the Monte because i didn't want to deal with the community that goes with GN's (the only worse community is viper owners,it should also be noted that i have met a some really cool GN and viper owners but a large circle of them have their heads up their ass because they believe their respective cars are the best ever made by man), nor did i want to have to worry about destroying the value of the car by making it my own.

Boy this guys a dandy. Contradiction in every word coming out of his pie hole.:rolleyes:

the GN will hold a special place many people's hearts, but try to look at it with objective eyes (as hard as that may be for some of us) and while it might have been a barnstormer in the 80's, now the performance numbers are pretty ho-hum. (the front drive impala SS bests it) if its your dream car i wont try and ruin your dreams, im just saying from a practical sense, you could go faster for less money and have a car that looks just about the same.

So I guess that means the Impala SS was also faster than his MCSS.:rolleyes:
 
Thats why post counts dont amount for crap, and idiot can make a lot of posts. Some people listen to the guy w/ the most posts on a forum, many times they take advice from an idiot. This guy is an ignorant fool that should have quit on page 2.
 
For the most part...

there seems to be some knowledgeable former Buick owners on that site. Besides the one retard, the Buicks were respected if not feared ;) .
 
The new impala is a V8 North Star engine... I hope it could beat a stock 20 year old V6.
 
Thats some funny sheeot right there. Reminds me of a couple years ago on the infield of the Daytona Speedway, couple of guys walk right through our TB tent and look at the 20+ black cars and mumble "Monte Carlo Wannabees" :rolleyes:
 
everyone knows that buick gn's are slow, unless you bought a gnx;) with the twin turbo option:p
 
Congratulations,


I pissed myself reading that thread. It was worth every drop and a new pair of jeans.

I'm gonna go hop in my overrated G-body and limp home.
 
This is from post #52.

It explains a lot.....:rolleyes:



Quote:
Originally Posted by HXCMCSS
hi, Im Travis, i own a 1986 Monte Carlo SS, ive this car since since i was 16 and built it with my dad

Engine Specs
355 CID Gen I SBC
Cast Iron 882 Heads with mild port work
10.3-1 compression
Keith Black Hyper Pistons
Factory Rods and Crank
Comp Cams XE268h-10
Comp Cams Valve springs
Manley Valves I-1.94 E-1.50
Edelbrock Performer EPS Intake
Edelbrock Performer 600 CFM carb

Transmission Specs
Th-200-4r
B&M 2200 Stall Converter
GN spec Pump, Stator, Servo
Alto red frictions
B&M Shift-Kit
Shifted by a B&M Megashifter
built by Whitfield Transmission

Rearend
Richmond 3.73 gears
Auburn LSD

the last time i ran it, before i installed the LSD it ran a 14.6@97 on 235/60R15's with a 2.26 60ft.


Thats a lot of work to put into a car that STILL can't beat a stock 86-87 turbo Buick.

Over rated....
 
Back
Top